Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17c991e081e28de2$60970$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:12:06 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Well...
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <ngZJVPwcxVWqGIkjELXo-oGMU4I@jntp> <v0br7e$24s67$1@i2pn2.org> <v0dbbn$2uu5v$1@dont-email.me> <17c981db6d4298e0$60968$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v0dej0$2vkhq$1@dont-email.me> <17c98afbc9881733$60969$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v0dqck$3262k$1@dont-email.me> <17c98f4ae7104579$337$256543$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <v0dtk3$32u0p$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v0dtk3$32u0p$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 32
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:12:06 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1817
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c991e081e28de2$60970$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2223

W dniu 25.04.2024 o 17:41, Python pisze:
> Le 25/04/2024 à 17:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 25.04.2024 o 16:46, Python pisze:
>>> Le 25/04/2024 à 16:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> ...
>>>> See, [snip profanity] - I've proven the mumble of [...]
>>>> [...] to be inconsistent
>>>
>>> Wozmaniak, you couldn't even recognize an inconsistency
>>> if it kicked you in the face.
>>>
>>> Your tale about the definition of a second is a big laugh
>>> in all physics dept where it has been mentioned.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> See, trash - I've proven the mumble of your
>> beloved guru to be inconsistent, [snip rant]
> 
> Come on, Wozmaniak, you've done nothing of that kind :-)
> 
> 

Oh, yes, poor trash. Have shown directly 2
predictions of his absurd physics denying each
othewr; that means - I've shown its inconsistency.

No surprise, of course, that you don't know
what inconsistency is, after your shows about
roots, functions and other subjects.