Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17c991e081e28de2$60970$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:12:06 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Well... Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <ngZJVPwcxVWqGIkjELXo-oGMU4I@jntp> <v0br7e$24s67$1@i2pn2.org> <v0dbbn$2uu5v$1@dont-email.me> <17c981db6d4298e0$60968$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v0dej0$2vkhq$1@dont-email.me> <17c98afbc9881733$60969$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v0dqck$3262k$1@dont-email.me> <17c98f4ae7104579$337$256543$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <v0dtk3$32u0p$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v0dtk3$32u0p$2@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 32 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:12:06 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1817 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17c991e081e28de2$60970$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2223 W dniu 25.04.2024 o 17:41, Python pisze: > Le 25/04/2024 à 17:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 25.04.2024 o 16:46, Python pisze: >>> Le 25/04/2024 à 16:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> ... >>>> See, [snip profanity] - I've proven the mumble of [...] >>>> [...] to be inconsistent >>> >>> Wozmaniak, you couldn't even recognize an inconsistency >>> if it kicked you in the face. >>> >>> Your tale about the definition of a second is a big laugh >>> in all physics dept where it has been mentioned. >>> >>> >> >> >> See, trash - I've proven the mumble of your >> beloved guru to be inconsistent, [snip rant] > > Come on, Wozmaniak, you've done nothing of that kind :-) > > Oh, yes, poor trash. Have shown directly 2 predictions of his absurd physics denying each othewr; that means - I've shown its inconsistency. No surprise, of course, that you don't know what inconsistency is, after your shows about roots, functions and other subjects.