Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 03:53:20 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: BIDEN: "Trump Won't Denounce Political Violence!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <R7SdnYbK0udVhZP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v08p5l$1nqt1$1@dont-email.me> <-tCdnY1hhoThbrr7nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com> <v091a7$1pn0t$1@dont-email.me> <h_KdnZT1vOqZjLX7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v09epc$1t26h$1@dont-email.me> <J_CdnTVN7o2K_7X7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v09tc9$23ll3$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-E249B1.10475824042024@news.giganews.com> <v0bjfr$2fjhq$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-6BBDFC.11594224042024@news.giganews.com> <v0btdb$2hs0l$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A90550.15115124042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-A90550.15115124042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 84
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:53:21 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4590
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c9c883bc6281b4$273132$3565594$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4972

On 4/24/24 5:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v0btdb$2hs0l$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/24/2024 2:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v0bjfr$2fjhq$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/24/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v09tc9$23ll3$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/23/2024 9:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/23/2024 3:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2024 at 12:14:14 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/23/2024 1:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2024 at 9:55:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/22/2024 11:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2024 at 1:49:53 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> People hired *because* they're trans aren't "replacing women"...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When a troon is the 'brand ambassador' for Nike's women's
>>>>>>>>>>> sportswear line, yes he has taken a job that would normally go
>>>>>>>>>>> to a woman.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then there's all the beauty pageants who have recently been
>>>>>>>>>>> selecting troons as the winners. Again, an accolade (and
>>>>>>>>>>> subsequent endorsement opportunity) that rightly belongs to a
>>>>>>>>>>> woman if the title is "Miss" Anything.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The appeal of novelty is always marketable, and always brief.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Says the guy who just two levels up was claiming that "trans people
>>>>>>>>> are indeed 'marginalized' by the public as too unsavory for
>>>>>>>>> commercialization" and aren't "within shouting distance of the
>>>>>>>>> mainstream".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What's more mainstream than Nike, Victoria's Secret, Sports
>>>>>>>>> Illustrated, and Miss America?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And none of those mainstream businesses is above virtue-signaling and
>>>>>>>> sensationalism.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So even when I give you the cite(s) you asked for, you immediately
>>>>>>> dismiss them as 'doesn't count' because of virtue signaling. It's
>>>>>>> always a rigged game with you people, isn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Afaics, you cited "new" exposures, which don't replace "established"
>>>>>> ones, because they're more of sideshow than a product pitch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which was always going to be the case because society has only lost its
>>>>> collective mind over this nonsense relatively recently. There was never
>>>>> going to be a cite from the 1950s of a major corporation hiring a troon
>>>>> to rep them.
>>>>>
>>>>> As I said, rigged game.
>>>>
>>>> Only if you're playing one. Apart from whatever satisfaction your
>>>> indignance may afford you, there's no reason to think that the male and
>>>> female demographics are going to be supplanted (or, if you will,
>>>> *trans*planted) any time soon. And they're what drives hiring, here.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, real women should just shut up and take one for the team
>>> while this 'progressive' lunacy runs its course?
>>
>> Until real men start switching teams, real women don't give a shit.
> 
> All evidence to contrary. Enough real women


How many have you surveyed?


  have been giving a shit that
> the troons have had to come up with a denigrating slur to smear them and
> have lobbied to have laws passed to criminalize them.