Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17cf4deaf94022ba$22469$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 03:34:14 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 68
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:34:14 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3940
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17cf4deaf94022ba$22469$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4348

On 5/13/24 3:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>        moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>      On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of
>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that
>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the
>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she
>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that
>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?...
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the
>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have
>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about the truth?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure*
>>>>>> carries some risk.
>>>>>
>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that
>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population.
>>>>>
>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective".
>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested
>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.)
>>>>
>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And
>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told.
>>>
>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own
>>> good.
>>>    
>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context,
>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to
>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.
>>
>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have
>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe.
> 
> Except for the people who were injured by it.


More Oath Keepers bullshit.