Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17cf4deaf94022ba$22469$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 03:34:14 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> In-Reply-To: <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 68 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:34:14 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3940 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17cf4deaf94022ba$22469$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4348 On 5/13/24 3:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>, > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>, >>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of >>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that >>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the >>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she >>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that >>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the >>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have >>>>>>>> said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How about the truth? >>>>>> >>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* >>>>>> carries some risk. >>>>> >>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that >>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. >>>>> >>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". >>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested >>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) >>>> >>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And >>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. >>> >>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own >>> good. >>> >>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, >>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to >>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation. >> >> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have >> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe. > > Except for the people who were injured by it. More Oath Keepers bullshit.