Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 03:29:53 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: CA Teacher Fired for Refusing to Use Preferred Pronouns; Wins Big in Lawsuit
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <u8qdnci3yuc-x9j7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <9j8b4j55h72rilsk2r9pa3avveiiaun75t@4ax.com> <gd1c4jl62k06agjej9jo040283v6mdfobt@4ax.com> <1960000608.737567575.955210.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <atropos-99446A.11372816052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-99446A.11372816052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 51
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 08:29:23 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3094
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17d0396500cadaaa$27$3113228$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3472

On 5/16/24 1:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <1960000608.737567575.955210.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
>   anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
> 
>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 May 2024 23:08:20 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2024 01:00:19 +0000, BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A California school district has settled a lawsuit with a teacher who
>>>>> says she was fired over her religious beliefs after she refused to use
>>>>> students' preferred pronouns, attorneys say.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Jurupa Unified School District in Riverside County agreed to pay
>>>>> $360,000 to Jessica Tapia, her attorneys at Advocates for Faith &
>>>>> Freedom said in a May 14 news release.
>>>>>
>>>>> The settlement closes a federal lawsuit Tapia filed last May that
>>>>> alleged the district's decision to fire Tapia violated her civil and
>>>>> 1st Amendment rights, according to the lawsuit.
>>>>>
>>>> Was she fired because she refused to use he/her or he/her/god knows
>>>> what?
>>>
>>> I am an Attack Helicopter and shall henceforth be referred to as such.
>>> I can remember when this pronoun discussion first started up many
>>> years ago. People deriding it often said they should be referred to as
>>> attack helicopters henceforth instead of he or she.
>>>
>>>> My question is of course designed to see if her "crime" was the same
>>>> one that brought Jordan Peterson to prominence or something else?
>>>> (Peterson said he'd use he/her as desired but wouldn't use a made up
>>>> pronoun)
>>>
>>
>> But “attack helicopter” isn’t pronouns
> 
> Neither is a unicorn or a fairy but the 'progressive' gender lunatics
> are full of weirdos trying to claim they're 'neo-pronouns'. Hell some of
> them are even trying to use verbs as pronouns (and expecting you and me
> to go along with it because they say so).


Anything that moves society forward is progressive.  Anything that 
doesn't is regressive.  Right wing assholes pretend to be regressive. 
Sure they have homosexuals, and women that get abortions, and women that 
have jobs but they just pretend all these things don't exist because 
they're pretentious stupid assholes.