Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 03:58:50 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Stormy Daniels Gave "Disastrous" Testimony In Trump Trial, CNN Legal Analyst Says
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <Ubt146$3dvu1$17@dont-email.me> <ufi64j9p5th7nmr25dk6q4in75v8bohjjf@4ax.com> <v1vrvv$9d31$1@solani.org> <v200c2$89tl$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-87B68A.09430014052024@news.giganews.com> <v29nhl$2mmaj$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A68862.11224218052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-A68862.11224218052024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 96
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 08:58:50 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4686
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17d0d8298af24ae6$71877$347424$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5065

On 5/18/24 1:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v29nhl$2mmaj$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/14/24 12:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v200c2$89tl$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Crosspost to newsgroups Ubi doesn't read cut
>>>>
>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/14/2024 4:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> Sun, 12 May 2024 04:30:46 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The article that Ubi the shithead plagarized is this:
>>>>
>>>> Stormy Daniels Gave 'Disastrous' Testimony In Trump Trial, CNN Legal
>>>> Analyst Says
>>>> By Daniel Chaitin
>>>> The Daily Wire
>>>> May 8, 2024
>>>> https://www.dailywire.com/news/stormy-daniels-gave-disastrous-testimony-in-
>>>> tru
>>>> mp-trial-cnn-legal-analyst-says
>>>>
>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>
>>>>>> The prosecutors have yet to produce ANY evidence that Trump committed
>>>>>> any crime.
>>>>
>>>>> He's charged with covering up payments to her for killing her story to
>>>>> interfere with his 2016 campaign. That's the crime and they have proved
>>>>> it with other witnesses.
>>>>
>>>> Just a moment. You need to explain this in full.
>>>>
>>>> She was looking for a payout. She approached people close to Trump
>>>> seeking money and wanted to speed the process along by threating to sell
>>>> her story to someone else if she didn't receive her payout.
>>>>
>>>> That's extortion. No one has yet explained why her actions couldn't have
>>>> been prosecuted under state law.
>>>>
>>>> Trump's first instinct was to treat her like he treated subcontractors
>>>> on developments: Stall the payment or not pay at all. At first he wanted
>>>> to wait till after the election, for if he lost, nothing she was selling
>>>> would be of value. He was advised to spend the money to make problem go
>>>> away.
>>>>
>>>> None of this is criminal.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not even sure if paying extortion is a criminal act on the part of
>>>> the victim.
>>>>
>>>> The payment to her was a crime, not because buying rights so she won't
>>>> publish what she claimed was her story is a crime, but because keeping
>>>> it from being published was of some benefit to Trump as a candidate and
>>>> it wasn't disclosed as required in federal law.
>>>
>>> If that's the standard, then Democrats have all broken that law by not
>>> disclosing MSNBC and CNN, which are a lot more than just some benefit to
>>> Democrats as candidates.
>>>
>>>> What Trump is being prosecuted for is ordering that the payment to
>>>> reimburse Cohen be written from one of the companies Trump controlled
>>>> and taken as a business expense of that company.
>>>
>>> They're saying it boils down to Trump notating the payment to Cohen as
>>> "legal expenses", which is falsifying a business record. This in a city
>>> that's a violent hellhole...
>>
>> <MAGA Bullshit snipped>
> 
> Inconvenient evidence of Bragg's prosecutorial hypocrisy snipped for
> advantage by Effa restored:
> 
>> where thugs are making a sport out of walking up to random women and
>> punching them so hard, the bones in their faces are shattered. And when
>> caught, they're released on no bail almost immediately.


LOL!  If bail is permitted, is there a time frame that's supposed to 
instituted?  Specious, Trump like "logic."


  Alvin Bragg won't
>> aggressively prosecute *that* but Trump putting a vague term in the memo
>> line on a check to Cohen is apparently worth spending millions of dollars
>> of prosecution resources.
>>
>> But don't say this is weaponizing the courts against political
>> opponents. That means you're a conspiracy theorist!
>>
>> Trump should have just written "reimbursement" on the memo line. That
>> would have been completely truthful and yet in no way revealing.