Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17d319c37d881402$2201937$255119$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 19:23:30 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math References: <17d2d227785459c1$1973722$261710$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v2tohm$1afdt$1@paganini.bofh.team> <17d2ee2495a963ae$1946029$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v2vhg3$1icfg$1@paganini.bofh.team> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v2vhg3$1icfg$1@paganini.bofh.team> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 39 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 17:23:30 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2131 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d319c37d881402$2201937$255119$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2539 W dniu 26.05.2024 o 16:37, Devan χωροκεντρομένο pisze: > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second As seen, the definition of second >>>> loved so much to be invoked by relativistic morons - wasn't valid in >>>> the time when their idiot guru lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was >>>> ordinary 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics. >>> >>> you dont undrestand. That second is based on a oscillation which is too >>> long. A smaller duration oscillation proves the longer wrong. That's >>> why the smaller is better. >> >> Maybe it is; still - the longer one was good enough for your idiot guru >> , and for the first generations of relativistic idiots as well - and >> that makes their mumble inconsistent. > > that's imprecise, me frendo. Doesn't have to be. TAI, GPS time, UTC - are slightly different from each other. True. The reality is not a perfect gedankenwelt, me frendo. A lot of scientist usenet users dont know > that, ie in computers, timing is essential. Without a second you can trust, Which, as anyone can check GPS - is NOT your ISO absurd. You may imagine your concept is superbrilliant; but have you measured its superbrilliancy or you just believe it is? Doesn't really matter for the thread. The second of your idiot guru was what it was and thus his mumble was not even consistent.