Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17d60339e5fd034e$1720$424441$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:04:16 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: SpaceTime Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <6249F967.3B4A@ix.netcom.com> <17d537553944a2de$5$422432$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <51a50934574cfb09144c2a6c26eceb74@www.novabbs.com> <udidndQOHOqpNcH7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <5dba54ad373d3e9a50644c063f71a5b1@www.novabbs.com> <LkiaDz8Otko5Q-u5wJLOx98bx6k@jntp> <c1c87b515e8d35ea861b9ce9c93806a4@www.novabbs.com> <QuGdnWLN2ex2k8D7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <5a03b3defc4af4304b84f5d6059306b0@www.novabbs.com> <HqK7tE25UvDlFWACDo6XkDlMmc8@jntp> <x-GUA3gSMM7qoJxNKwowFL7PlL0@jntp> <84577d0ba2dfe57966134b255c381c62@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <84577d0ba2dfe57966134b255c381c62@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 27 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 05:04:15 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1890 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d60339e5fd034e$1720$424441$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2295 W dniu 05.06.2024 o 06:11, gharnagel pisze: > Python wrote: >> >> Le 04/06/2024 à 16:51, Richard Hachel a écrit : >> > >> > Pour ce qui est des transformations de Poincaré-Lorentz, données par >> le >> > fameux mathématicien français, qui était plus fort que Newton, >> Einstein >> > et Leibniz réunis, elles conduisent directement à: >> > > >> <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?HqK7tE25UvDlFWACDo6XkDlMmc8@jntp/Data.Media:1> >> >> This is a formula that is part of standard SR (i.e. Einstein), >> unrelated >> to your idiotic rant. >> >> You've done that before, numerous time. You want a medal for that? > > Yes, it's correct. It is confirmed here: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula So what? The idiotic mumble of your idiotic guru was not even consistent, and it has been proven, poor halfbrain.