Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17d6fc3a3c413794$7931$3648231$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:07:14 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Steve Bannon
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <17d6aa2a4ae8f48d$87559$705664$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com> <v3vhvo$25r02$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-435E39.12304207062024@news.giganews.com> <v3vt1e$27vl4$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <v3vt1e$27vl4$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:07:14 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1794
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17d6fc3a3c413794$7931$3648231$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2111

On 6/7/24 4:11 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> Lois Lerner, Obama IRS executive, defied a congressional subpoena to
>> testify about her apparently partisan policy of denying 501(3)(c) status
>> only to conservative groups. She was found in contempt of Congress.
>> Obama's DOJ refused to prosecute. Nothing happened to her.
> 
> Will you please stop repeating that nonsense? IRS had a shortage of
> executives. She was wearing two hats, and was working mostly at the
> second job in Washington and not her main job over exempt organizations
> in Cincinnati. New people were hired to review applications, and they
> were doing review improperly. She wasn't there supervising. She never
> ordered anyone to do those things.


Ouch, condemned by Adam H. Verman, that's gotta suck!


> Also, who the hell told all of those 501(c)(4)s to apply for
> recognition? It's voluntary and there is no benefit to it, and if IRS
> gets it wrong, it does NOT prevent the organization from going about its
> business. We never hear that part of the story, why anyone was telling
> people to seek recognition.
> 
>> . . .