| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:33:20 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com> <v4ih8u$336lr$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C652A7.15471614062024@news.giganews.com> <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> In-Reply-To: <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 31 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:33:20 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2139 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2519 On 6/15/24 11:46 AM, moviePig wrote: > On 6/15/2024 4:20 AM, trotsky wrote: >> On 6/14/24 5:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> The Federal Firearms Act of 1934 >> >> >> From wiki: >> >> The current National Firearms Act (NFA) defines a number of categories >> of regulated firearms. These weapons are collectively known as NFA >> firearms and include the following: >> >> Machine guns >> "any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily >> restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual >> reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also >> include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed >> and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed >> and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and >> any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if >> such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person."[10] > > So, bump-stocks are patently a "workaround" for a law whose intent is > patently obvious. Not exactly a triumph of sanity. "A work around" is accurate. And the spirit of the law is far more important, obviously, than the letter of the law so right wing shitbags on SCOTUS aren't helping American society in the slightest. Just the opposite.