Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:49:24 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: The relativistic cage paradox
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <6nCzdljG9QXvqOx_YRhHvJPVWhc@jntp> <v4rqpu$19r3f$2@dont-email.me> <17da17ab3fea9795$49681$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v4rtbd$19r3f$4@dont-email.me> <17da1a976ecc4544$49682$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v4s18v$19r3f$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v4s18v$19r3f$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 62
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:49:24 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2868
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17da20b3c9b73b0f$49684$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3274

W dniu 18.06.2024 o 15:15, Python pisze:
> Le 18/06/2024 à 14:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 18.06.2024 o 14:08, Python pisze:
>>> Le 18/06/2024 à 14:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 18.06.2024 o 13:24, Python pisze:
>>>>> Le 18/06/2024 à 12:06, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>>>>> I notice a website where they talk about the relativistic cage 
>>>>>> paradox.
>>>>>
>>>>> link?
>>>>>
>>>>>> And it says: "If the animal is smaller than the cage, it can be in 
>>>>>> the cage; but if the cage is smaller, it cannot be in the cage."
>>>>>
>>>>> link? Nothing can be find either in French or English from this quote.
>>>>> You are well known for forging quotes for decades, by the way.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This ties in with the paradox of the train and the tunnel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is easily solved. It illustrates well the relativity of
>>>>> simultaneity. A more interesting one is the bug rivet paradox.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No more interesting than paradoxes developed
>>>> by any other religion.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What? One the "best logicians Humanity ever had" (LOL) is not
>>> interested? How sad...
>>
>> Whatever you imagine, the mumble of your
>> bunch od idiots is not at all more interesting
>> than the delusions of other religious maniacs.
> 
> As far as I know religions didn't predict correctly the outcome of
> experiments,

Neither you do. But, of course, you can scream
that you did and slander those who deny.
Any religion can do that.



  behaviour of devices or astronomic measures. SR and
> GR do.
> 
>>> So go back to your room, Wozniak. Nurses will be there at 4pm
>>> for your daily treatment.
>>
>> See, trash - I've proven the idiocies
>> of [snip profanities] to be not even consistent,
> 
> You did nothing of that kind. Your argument about definition
> of a second in Einstein's times is ridiculous.

Yes, I did. I have pointed directly 2 denying
themself predictions of the physics of
your idiot guru. And a fanatic piece
of shit waving arms, screaming "ridiculus!",
barking and slandering - changes nothing.
Really.