Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:56:35 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 51
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!news.1d4.us!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:56:36 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2979
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17daa7563bde17db$518476$1616079$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3387

On 6/19/24 2:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>,
>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
>>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
>>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
>>>>>> trespassing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
>>>>> 'social justice'.
>>>>
>>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
>>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
>>>
>>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
>>> residential neighborhood.
>>
>> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground
> 
> Why would you presume that?
> 
>> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc.
> 
> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my
> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's
> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition.


I totally agree.  Just as it's within the rights of the rest of the 
entire country to call those people a couple of Karens that looked like 
total assholes by the way they reacted.  They could just have called the 
cops and have them arrested for trespassing, and yet, you, representing 
the right wing asshole contingent, think that overreacting and looking 
like whiny bitches is something worth sticking up for. I would suggest, 
again, you get that piece of dogshit you call a brain to look less like 
dogshit and more like a brain.