Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:54:56 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <v41t67$2lmr3$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-E21869.11080908062024@news.giganews.com> <v46nc1$dg7s$1@dont-email.me> <HcKdnbn3yKP9rvr7nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com> <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-ACE440.13421918062024@news.giganews.com> <17da5cf281acbe0c$209699$2724781$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> <v52j86$2qnl3$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <v52j86$2qnl3$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 122
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:54:56 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 6146
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17daf5d38718fdbd$518542$1616079$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 6543

On 6/20/24 7:58 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 6/19/24 5:13 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 6/18/24 3:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v4rvqd$1brlu$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/10/24 1:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:17:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/8/24 2:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v41t67$2lmr3$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/7/24 3:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <v3uven$22nu4$4@dont-email.me>, FPP 
>>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/24 5:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <v3lkv6$3jgk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Secret Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> country. Most likely he would get home confinement to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mar-A-Largo which isn't really home confinement. Other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his inability to travel to do rallys. It's not like being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confined to a 2 bedroom home.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who says? You?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> convict get to choose his jailers now?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? He committed the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New York. He was indicted and convicted in New York. Why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instincts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell you? Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leader again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sympathetic to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dems and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attributions from now on before going full froth.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have
>>>>>>>>>>>> missed the attribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader 
>>>>>>>>>>>> again?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's for YOU.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of 
>>>>>>>>>>> punishment
>>>>>>>>>>> AT ALL, so other than directly out of your ass, I have no 
>>>>>>>>>>> idea where
>>>>>>>>>>> you're getting the "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or 
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Leader again?" and assigning it to me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You almost never comment on Dear Leader, do you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nice attempt at deflection but no one's falling for it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since I never commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, 
>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>> are you getting "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your 
>>>>>>>>> Dear
>>>>>>>>> Leader again?", other than out of your ass?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Remember, you've specifically directed that question to me now, so
>>>>>>>>> you can't pawn it off as a mistake or because your herpes eye 
>>>>>>>>> unguent
>>>>>>>>> confused you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And you think NOT commenting on a convicted felon and adjudicated
>>>>>>>> rapist and fraud says something good about you?
>>>>>>> Irrelevant. You claimed I did comment, so Mr. 
>>>>>>> I-Never-Post-Something-
>>>>>>> Without-Proof has painted himself into a corner yet again.
>>>>>> Not at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> So post the proof. Show me where I commented on Trump's potential
>>>>> sentencing details. Betcha won't because you can't.
>>>
>>>> You never mention Trump. That's the point.
>>>
>>> And yet you claimed I did comment on Trump.
>>>
>>> So that would be... wait for it... a lie.
>>
>>
>> I guess if it wasn't for being a gay asshole you wouldn't have any 
>> personality at all.  I'm reminded of the movie The Last Boy Scout: 
>> "Why did Oath Keeper Twat cross the road?  Because his dick was stuck 
>> in a chicken."
> 
> Guy who pretends to have gone past college on to Law School doesn't seem 
> to understand figures of speech, hyperbole or exaggeration.
> 
> “Always” and “Never” statements are frequently used by people when they 
> are arguing in order to emphasize or illustrate the merits of their 
> position. “Always” and “Never” statements are usually exaggerations, 
> which serve an illustrative purpose and are understood by both parties 
> to be hyperbole and not literal."


Yes, and isn't isn't sad that because of his perpetual lying and 
obtuseness we even have to discuss remedial stuff like this?