Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:28:44 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Space and spacetime
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <665bf2c2f8d8af99ae6b28936ec91eed@www.novabbs.com> <17da7d7a6a39459a$163213$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <972e62f21cba1316f2184b61c6a0c401@www.novabbs.com> <17da9b4080dd35af$266525$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <a4eb8b42ce7499e5ec60bde25e4e865a@www.novabbs.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ccf5155edb060554bdacb76d43c78f36@www.novabbs.com> <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9ae2e2bf5f37a77b3e1bd160981c6fd5@www.novabbs.com> <17db1164fde32607$208349$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <392fcd2a13fa911f8f6d5182fb485f7b@www.novabbs.com> <17db1a8a53f81f54$288216$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <766d95371391c171627beb10f0e1ae9c@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <766d95371391c171627beb10f0e1ae9c@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 96
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:28:45 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4397
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17db25828bda4e92$4$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4748

W dniu 21.06.2024 o 23:46, gharnagel pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 21.06.2024 o 20:21, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Put your explaination straight into your
>> > > dumb, fanatic ass, where it belongs.
>> > > An autistic "information engineer" who can't understand
>> > metaphor gets really asinine when his fuzzy-thinking is
> 
> 
>> A fanatic piece of lying ship, caught on an
>> impudent, obvious  lie is screaming about a
>> "metaphor".
> 
> So Mad Maciej doesn't understand metaphor.  

Why won't you explain, you lying shit.
And why won't you stop dodging and
demonstrate the power of predictions
of your moronic Shit on my example.


Whoda thought :-))
> 
>> Why won't you stop dodging and answer - what is the predicttion
>> of the observer in my example according to the physics of your
>> idiot guru?
> 
> First the autistic information engineer must define his terms.


Must he?
But what does the relativistic piece of
shit mean by "define"? By "must"? By
"terms"?




>> Let's get to the point, sure. Is the RELATIVISTIC formula of velocity
>> adding  a part of Lorentz's ETHER theory?
>> Yes or no, trash.
> 
> First of all, no human being is trash, so Weird Wozzy doesn't really
> want an honest answer, which I already gave to him anyway:
> 
> "[Heinlein] also said that deriving something was just finding out
> what you already knew.  Meaning, of course, that it was all there
> in the original equations, implied, which is the case with relativistic
> velocity addition.

So, according to you and your idiot gurus -
in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not -
would observe light moving at speed c. Right?


   As anyone would know if he weren't mathematically
> incompetent."
> 
> Because of Wozzie's mathematical incompetence, he can't figure out that
> (1) relativistic velocity addition is DERIVED from the Lorentz
> transform
> equations.

It is, sure, after assuming the obviously correct
Holiest Postulate.
And speaking of mathematics - it's always
good to remind that your bunch of idiots
had to announce its oldest part false, as
it didn't want to fit the madness of your
insane guru.



> (2) "Lorentz's ETHER theory" has NOTHING to do with it because there is
> no ether*.  So LET is a dead end.  Dishonest Wozzie's attempt to insert
> that into his question was a red herring, a misleading fallacy.
> (3) The RVA equation is derived from the LT equations by dividing the
> equation for dx' by the equation for dt', so there is no "adding" to
> either LET or SR.
> 
> *Ether theory is a dead end because SR took away the last vestige of
> any
> physicality: that of motion.  IOW, it becomes fundamentally
> undetectable,
> which makes it nonexistent for all practical purposes.

And how about 0 meridian? Is it fundamentally
detectable?
If it is not - it must be nonexistent for all
practical purposes. Am I correct,  Harrie, poor
halfbrain?