| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17db5d8196a1506d$500$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:34:52 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Space and spacetime Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <a4eb8b42ce7499e5ec60bde25e4e865a@www.novabbs.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <ccf5155edb060554bdacb76d43c78f36@www.novabbs.com> <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9ae2e2bf5f37a77b3e1bd160981c6fd5@www.novabbs.com> <17db1164fde32607$208349$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <392fcd2a13fa911f8f6d5182fb485f7b@www.novabbs.com> <17db1a8a53f81f54$288216$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <766d95371391c171627beb10f0e1ae9c@www.novabbs.com> <17db25828bda4e92$4$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <57daee8da23d6ae5103795e3c9012685@www.novabbs.com> <17db37832753b835$79$484409$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3a011479b6a372004336be3d26a210b2@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <3a011479b6a372004336be3d26a210b2@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 97 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:34:53 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 4480 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17db5d8196a1506d$500$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4884 W dniu 22.06.2024 o 15:54, gharnagel pisze: > Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 22.06.2024 o 03:50, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> > > >> > > Why won't you explain, you lying shit. >> > > And why won't you stop dodging and >> > > demonstrate the power of predictions >> > > of your moronic Shit on my example. >> > > I'm not dodging. I'm merely asking consequential >> > question which Woozie-liar refuses to answer. >> >> Yes, you are. You're pretending even stupider >> than you are to dodge. > > No matter how many times Wozzie tells lies, i doesn't > make them true. His parents must be chagrinned at > his abysmal behavior. > And why won't you stop your iditic dodging and answer what are the prediction of the moronic physics of your moronic guru for my example? >> > > But what does the relativistic piece of >> > > shit mean by "define"? By "must"? By >> > > "terms"? >> > > I just want everything clearly and honestly laid out. >> >> You must define "clearly and honestly". And "define". >> And "must". > > Such terms are human terms, and those that are fully human > understand them implicitly. Terms like "speed" and "time" are the terms of physicists, i.e. Gods. I'm getting it. > > So, according to you and your idiot gurus - >> > > in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not - >> > > would observe light moving at speed c. Right? >> > > What's the matter, mathematically-incompetent Wozzie, >> > can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer >> > for yourself? >> >> The matter is that mathematically-incompetent Harrie >> can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer >> for me. > > I offered to derive the LTE for Wozzie, But can't deal with a set of assumptions different than The Shit of your idiot guru. It's not very complicated, but - well - you're an idiot. >> > > > (1) relativistic velocity addition is DERIVED from >> > > > the Lorentz transform equations. >> > > >> > > It is, sure, after assuming the obviously correct >> > > Holiest Postulate. >> > > The postulates were determined FIRST >> >> And without them - in LET - your idiocies can't be >> derived, neither from LT nor from experiments. > > There is no LET without the postulates If you mean the postulates of your idiot guru - well, the impudence of THIS lie is beating your usual level. >> A lie, of course. First - Lorentz invented his >> equations for his ether theory, then - your >> idiot guru came with his absurd postulates. > > So the "absurd" postulates result in the LTE exactly as > Lorentz invented them out of whole cloth, so how could they > possibly be absurd Simply. >> Unlike the Holy Postulates, told your >> idiot gurus by Nature itself when She >> spoke to them. Right, Harrie? > > Postulates are human constructs also, but they can be tested against Only such an idiot can believe and repeat such an absurd lie. But - see: 0 meridian has something in common with both The Shit of your idiot guru and Lorontz ether theory, after all...