Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:53:07 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com> <v4ih8u$336lr$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C652A7.15471614062024@news.giganews.com> <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4llgt$3s90d$1@dont-email.me> <17d97111755ab6ae$133791$675878$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com> <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me> <atropos-4879CF.14000618062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-10EF54.18431818062024@news.giganews.com> <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me> <atropos-0BD5BE.18320220062024@news.giganews.com> <v52n0u$2v630$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-76DC0A.22083520062024@news.giganews.com> <v56pju$3qb1e$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-2EB311.12290125062024@news.giganews.com> <v5mjtp$3cvu7$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <v5mjtp$3cvu7$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 103
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:53:08 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 5322
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17dd70eb30478fbc$4756$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5702

On 6/28/24 10:12 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 6/25/24 3:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <v56pju$3qb1e$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/21/24 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <v52n0u$2v630$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/20/24 9:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/18/24 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me>, FPP 
>>>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe if we all chipped in a few bucks, Clarenzabell and Sammy
>>>>>>>>>>> Flagflyer would change their votes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Weird how Alito's flag also has flown over San Francisco's 
>>>>>>>>>> city hall
>>>>>>>>>> for more than half a century. Hardly a bastion of 
>>>>>>>>>> conservatism, San
>>>>>>>>>> Francisco. Yet when SF prog pols fly it, it's no big deal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/S6wFxDy
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It was also used prominently by BLM during their 'mostly 
>>>>>>>>>> peaceful'
>>>>>>>>>> Summer of Love.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/Z8kvvMc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So to recap: a flag when flown by leftist pols and far-left 
>>>>>>>>>> violent
>>>>>>>>>> communist protest groups is totes cool, but the moment a 
>>>>>>>>>> conservative
>>>>>>>>>> raises it on his private property, he should be impeached and 
>>>>>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>>>>> from office.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard of
>>>>>>>>> impartiality than we do an organization like BLM.  Life's 
>>>>>>>>> unfair...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Government officials are government officials. If it's not a 
>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>> for the ones in San Francisco to fly it, it's not a problem for any
>>>>>>>> official to fly it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do they still fly it? And if not, why not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea. I haven't been to San Francisco in several years. But
>>>>>> they flew it for 60 years. If it was the appalling affront to 
>>>>>> democracy,
>>>>>> apple pie, and tiny, tiny babies that you act like it is, why were 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> good little progs of San Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of
>>>>>> government there for more than a half a century?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Then shut the fuck up about it if you admit you don't know what you're
>>>>> talking about today.
>>>>
>>>> It's apparent you have no answer to the question asked and no, I won't
>>>> "shut the fuck up" about anything. I'll speak about whatever I want,
>>>> whenever I want and I certainly don't need your permission to do so.
>>>>
>>>> 60 years, Effa. 60 years.
>>>>
>>>> And don't forget those BLMers. I guess we finally have proof they were
>>>> insurrectionists all along, since only insurrectionists fly that flag.
>>>>
>>> I gave you an answer. Either you didn't like it, or you couldn't 
>>> grasp it.
>>
>> No, I asked you:
>>
>> "If it was the appalling affront to democracy, apple pie, and tiny, tiny
>> babies that you act like it is, why were the good little progs of San
>> Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of government there for more
>> than a half a century?"
>>
>> And you just told me to "shut the fuck up about it". That's not an
>> answer to the question posed to you.
>>
>> That's a dodge and an evasion.
>>
>>> MAGA co-opted the flag
>>
>> One guy waving it at one protest does not a "co-opt" make, you dipshit.
>>
> 
> One guy... what a joke you are.  Can't read, and now can't count.


Maybe he's missing a capital letter and talking about a guy named Guy.