Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17dd81ee27dea0f5$1$496440$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:04:52 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^2 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <KDKdnarg5JDvFOL7nZ2dnZfqnPiWy52d@giganews.com> <IJSdnZK-R6fFgx37nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <IJSdnZK-R6fFgx37nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 75 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 15:04:52 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3722 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17dd81ee27dea0f5$1$496440$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4124 W dniu 29.06.2024 o 16:46, Ross Finlayson pisze: > On 06/28/2024 09:11 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 06/28/2024 09:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>> In "Out of My Later Years", Einstein's introduces another >>> mass-energy equivalence formula after kinetic terms. >>> >>> So if it's sort of Einstein's second-most famous formula, >>> why hasn't anybody heard of it? >>> >>> m'/m = e/c^2 >>> >>> It introduces that the terms in the rotational, make >>> for that mass-energy equivalence only sits in the >>> rotational setting, among all the other usual terms. >>> >>> It's introduced in a brief note near the end of >>> the material on science in Einstein's "Out of My >>> Later Years". >>> >>> It really makes for a sort of way to make it so >>> that the space-contraction results real while >>> also that the linear is rather Galilean, while >>> still fulfilling all the usual derivations, if >>> not necessarily the rhetoric or intuitions, >>> yet very intuitionistically while all formally. >>> >>> >>> It's pretty great I wonder why it's not well-known. >>> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor >> >> > > These ideas in "Lorentz factor" in accommodating what are > the "fictitious forces", which are real, and making for > why there is boost addition with regards to addition > formulae in what are continuous milieux, often harkens > to the "Larmor forces" and "Larmor formula", "Lorentz-Larmor". > > > Then, "Lorentz factor" also reflects that in the "Lorentz > transformations", that it results about differential analysis > being about constants vis-a-vis implicits, of course about > metrics and norms of fields and gauges, helping explain why > Einstein's theory by itself, and Feynman's theories themselves, > have the _forms_ of the coordinate-free according to tensors, > or the quantum amplitudes according to discretization, yet > as well these have continuous _forms_, that "Lorentz factor" > has all the components of "Lorentz transform" broken out > as variously projective, for various purposes, here then > mostly for "space-contraction" and "FitzGerald", then that > FitzGerald, Larmor, Heaviside, and Faraday, are close to Maxwell. > > Einstein: in his "Out of My Later Years", which is great, > has that he _does_ make for that SR is local, then that > GR being fundamental thusly, then that m'/m = e/c^2, > is a quite _profound_ connection of the objects of > Einstein's theory, both equipping the rotational setting > for mass-energy equivalency, and, detaching it from the > Galilean. > > So, Einstein's second mass-energy equivalency relation, > and the relation to Einstein's bridges about the centrally > symmetrical, with how he left his board, are key concepts > connecting the classical and the superclassical, > and showing how mathematically it's a thing. > > And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by the idiot "improper" clocks of GPS and TAI keep measuring t'=t, just like all the serious clocks always did.