Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17dd81ee27dea0f5$1$496440$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:04:52 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^2
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <KDKdnarg5JDvFOL7nZ2dnZfqnPiWy52d@giganews.com> <IJSdnZK-R6fFgx37nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <IJSdnZK-R6fFgx37nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 75
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 15:04:52 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3722
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17dd81ee27dea0f5$1$496440$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4124

W dniu 29.06.2024 o 16:46, Ross Finlayson pisze:
> On 06/28/2024 09:11 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 06/28/2024 09:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> In "Out of My Later Years", Einstein's introduces another
>>> mass-energy equivalence formula after kinetic terms.
>>>
>>> So if it's sort of Einstein's second-most famous formula,
>>> why hasn't anybody heard of it?
>>>
>>> m'/m = e/c^2
>>>
>>> It introduces that the terms in the rotational, make
>>> for that mass-energy equivalence only sits in the
>>> rotational setting, among all the other usual terms.
>>>
>>> It's introduced in a brief note near the end of
>>> the material on science in Einstein's "Out of My
>>> Later Years".
>>>
>>> It really makes for a sort of way to make it so
>>> that the space-contraction results real while
>>> also that the linear is rather Galilean, while
>>> still fulfilling all the usual derivations, if
>>> not necessarily the rhetoric or intuitions,
>>> yet very intuitionistically while all formally.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's pretty great I wonder why it's not well-known.
>>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor
>>
>>
> 
> These ideas in "Lorentz factor" in accommodating what are
> the "fictitious forces", which are real, and making for
> why there is boost addition with regards to addition
> formulae in what are continuous milieux, often harkens
> to the "Larmor forces" and "Larmor formula", "Lorentz-Larmor".
> 
> 
> Then, "Lorentz factor" also reflects that in the "Lorentz
> transformations", that it results about differential analysis
> being about constants vis-a-vis implicits, of course about
> metrics and norms of fields and gauges, helping explain why
> Einstein's theory by itself, and Feynman's theories themselves,
> have the _forms_ of the coordinate-free according to tensors,
> or the quantum amplitudes according to discretization, yet
> as well these have continuous _forms_, that "Lorentz factor"
> has all the components of "Lorentz transform" broken out
> as variously projective, for various purposes, here then
> mostly for "space-contraction" and "FitzGerald", then that
> FitzGerald, Larmor, Heaviside, and Faraday, are close to Maxwell.
> 
> Einstein: in his "Out of My Later Years", which is great,
> has that he _does_ make for that SR is local, then that
> GR being fundamental thusly, then that m'/m = e/c^2,
> is a quite _profound_ connection of the objects of
> Einstein's theory, both equipping the rotational setting
> for mass-energy equivalency, and, detaching it from the
> Galilean.
> 
> So, Einstein's second mass-energy equivalency relation,
> and the relation to Einstein's bridges about the centrally
> symmetrical, with how he left his board, are key concepts
> connecting the classical and the superclassical,
> and showing how mathematically it's a thing.
> 
> 

And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
by the idiot "improper" clocks of GPS and TAI keep
measuring t'=t, just like all the serious clocks
always did.