Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17dde2497ab63c19$847$1235238$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:30:37 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Snopes Finally Debunks Left-Wing Claim of "Very Fine People" in Charlottesville Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <eRicnR36Ss1EluL7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <v5n3i8$3fp7d$2@dont-email.me> <p89u7jp61lh9r79gnljm2cqip3qrq5k7qs@4ax.com> <v5nd2o$3ho0r$1@dont-email.me> <fxWfO.43481$Gurd.17458@fx34.iad> <v5pem2$rk0$1@dont-email.me> <v5pffp$rk0$3@dont-email.me> <17ddc2e97a47e23a$169216$916931$50d51a61@news.newsdemon.com> <v5s15b$jil7$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> In-Reply-To: <v5s15b$jil7$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 92 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:30:37 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 4654 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17dde2497ab63c19$847$1235238$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 5071 On 6/30/24 11:29 AM, moviePig wrote: > On 6/30/2024 6:55 AM, trotsky wrote: >> On 6/29/24 12:15 PM, moviePig wrote: >>> On 6/29/2024 1:01 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>> On 6/29/2024 12:22 PM, trotsky wrote: >>>>> On 6/28/24 5:22 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>> On 6/28/2024 5:10 PM, shawn wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:39:52 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's seven years after the fact and the damage has long since >>>>>>>>> been done, but >>>>>>>>> the left-wing fact checkers at Snopes have finally come out and >>>>>>>>> admitted the >>>>>>>>> whole claim that Trump called neo-Nazis "very fine people" was >>>>>>>>> a hoax. I have >>>>>>>>> no idea why, but credit where it's due, I suppose? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's another example of the more Trump talked, the more he buried >>>>>>>> himself. There was no way for him to win. He should have ignored >>>>>>>> it, or >>>>>>>> limited his comments to condemning the murder. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't put the "let's go beat up Nazis" counterprotestors on a >>>>>>>> high >>>>>>>> moral plane. As far as I could tell, the protestors on both >>>>>>>> sides had >>>>>>>> pretty low morals. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've personally objected to the removal of Civil War monuments >>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>> the generals god-like, but MY reason is rather different than the >>>>>>>> neo-Nazis: I don't think the modern generation should be re-writing >>>>>>>> history. A past generation erected those monuments and we need >>>>>>>> to look >>>>>>>> the ugliness of American history square in the face so we never >>>>>>>> forget >>>>>>>> that Civil War generals were honored by certain Americans for >>>>>>>> the modern >>>>>>>> politics of that era. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> People are worried about those statues glorifying the actions of >>>>>>> those >>>>>>> people. I don't think the reasons behind the erecting of the statues >>>>>>> or the timing is brought up that often. Certainly I never knew >>>>>>> growing >>>>>>> up the time frame for the erecting of the statues or the actual >>>>>>> reasons behind it. It would be better to have kept the statues >>>>>>> and put >>>>>>> more effort into teaching the history behind their erection. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not that I think it would change things as it seems most people >>>>>>> forget >>>>>>> what little bit of history they get taught in school not long after >>>>>>> leaving school. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I despite prettying up history. Trump was still wrong. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed. History is full of ugly moments that are best remembered in >>>>>>> the hopes that we don't repeat them. >>>>>> >>>>>> A descriptive plaque with any such statue would seem to be so >>>>>> obvious a solution that you have to wonder if both sides >>>>>> vehemently oppose it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We don't need statues to learn history. >>>> >>>> In fact, these statues seem to be about forgetting it... >>> >>> Also: my point is that, even if Trump had said verbatim "Nazis are >>> fine people", it'd be defensible as a (non-Freudian) slip of the >>> tongue ...because Trump simply isn't suicidal. And, trying to indict >>> him on such weak claims only undercuts the many strong ones. >> >> None of what you said has anything to do with the facts in evidence. > > The fact is that even if there were a video of Trump saying "Nazis are > fine people" (which, afaik, there isn't) it would beggar plausibility. He said there are fine people on both sides. Why don't you get what the discussion is about?