| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17ddff464dbd131b$21$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:21:51 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin" Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <218bad07e23f4a46a00f34853e2bcf1d@www.novabbs.com> <v5ohjh$3rj15$1@dont-email.me> <f0d1b17bf2a89bba6f0f8348aff99bde@www.novabbs.com> <v5r9b7$f8df$1@dont-email.me> <6681bcff$0$11694$426a34cc@news.free.fr> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <6681bcff$0$11694$426a34cc@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 28 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:21:50 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2045 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17ddff464dbd131b$21$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> W dniu 30.06.2024 o 22:15, J. J. Lodder pisze: > Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 2024-06-29 18:10:03 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said: >> >>> How is light affected twice as much by gravity as everything else, >>> according to relativity? According to Galileo and Eotvos, everything is >>> affected the same by gravity regardless of mass or material. How does >>> relativity "spin" this discrepancy (to use a colloquialism)? >> >> The speed of an object determines how long the object is close enough >> to a more massive object that it is significantly deflected. Light is >> faster that anything else so it is deflected less than anything else >> (if passing the massive object at the same distance). >> >> A small object like a single atom can be accelerated to a speed that >> is only slightly less than the speed of light. Unfortunately a single >> atom is so easily lost that it has not yet been pssible to observe how >> much it is deflected by a massibe body. General Relativity predicts >> that it is deflected nearly as much as light. > > Indeed. It is very unkind of the universe > not to provide steady point sources of relativistic particles, And even worse - keeping clocks of GPS in sync, i.e indicating t'=t. The reality really can not be trusted. It's simply improper and nonstandard.