Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17ddff464dbd131b$21$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:21:51 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <218bad07e23f4a46a00f34853e2bcf1d@www.novabbs.com> <v5ohjh$3rj15$1@dont-email.me> <f0d1b17bf2a89bba6f0f8348aff99bde@www.novabbs.com> <v5r9b7$f8df$1@dont-email.me> <6681bcff$0$11694$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <6681bcff$0$11694$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:21:50 +0000
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ddff464dbd131b$21$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 2342
Bytes: 2469

W dniu 30.06.2024 o 22:15, J. J. Lodder pisze:
> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-06-29 18:10:03 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>>
>>> How is light affected twice as much by gravity as everything else,
>>> according to relativity? According to Galileo and Eotvos, everything is
>>> affected the same by gravity regardless of mass or material. How does
>>> relativity "spin" this discrepancy (to use a colloquialism)?
>>
>> The speed of an object determines how long the object is close enough
>> to a more massive object that it is significantly deflected. Light is
>> faster that anything else so it is deflected less than anything else
>> (if passing the massive object at the same distance).
>>
>> A small object like a single atom can be accelerated to a speed that
>> is only slightly less than the speed of light. Unfortunately a single
>> atom is so easily lost that it has not yet been pssible to observe how
>> much it is deflected by a massibe body. General Relativity predicts
>> that it is deflected nearly as much as light.
> 
> Indeed. It is very unkind of the universe
> not to provide steady point sources of relativistic particles,

And even worse - keeping clocks of GPS in sync, i.e
indicating t'=t. The reality really can not be
trusted. It's simply improper and nonstandard.