Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 04:04:04 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: If Biden Loses Televised Debate, Can He Be Replaced?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <v5jusu$2pmlu$1@dont-email.me> <17dd712e093e033e$4759$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <vwSdnaUXHeafQBz7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vjn38jp2gpse1essga7hbglilult4tnfu4@4ax.com> <PCudncK6nb8Ofxz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <39p38jhnhvj2mjdj49e7ca4v97fpfd8in4@4ax.com> <IQydnduIEa-YdBz7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <v5t66b$t7km$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-027BD0.20103430062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-027BD0.20103430062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 72
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:04:05 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4055
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17de0b67226a03a8$349845$705664$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4536

On 6/30/24 10:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v5t66b$t7km$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/30/2024 7:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:56:19 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 30, 2024 at 3:40:41 PM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:32:34 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 2024 at 2:57:55 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/28/24 10:49 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <i18t7jdt9idsgamt2nrt6dctolugp38s76@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:01:49 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Earlier this month, Business Insider offered these possible
>>>>>>>>>>> replacements for Biden should he not be the nominee: Kamala
>>>>>>>>>>> Harris, governors Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI),
>>>>>>>>>>> Roy Cooper (D-N.C.), and Wes Moore (D-MD), and senators Amy
>>>>>>>>>>> Klobuchar (D-MN) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The knives are out already.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gavvy Newsom and Hillary were probably watching the debate from
>>>>>>>>> their respective lairs and whispering "Excellent" over their
>>>>>>>>> tented fingers in their best Monty Burns voice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What did they say after your guy Trump claimed (again) that Dems want
>>>>>>>> to kill babies after they're born?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leftists like Hutt are calling what Trump said about "post-birth"
>>>>>>> abortions and Ralph Northam a lie. Here's then-governor of Virginia
>>>>>>> Northam in his own words. You tell me what he's talking about if
>>>>>>> Trump was lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So that one guy represents all Dems?
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump specifically said Northam wanted post-birth abortions. Leftists
>>>>> went nuts and said that was a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's a lie, what is Northam talking about there?
>>>>
>>>> My point is Trump keeps saying Democrats want post-birth abortions.
>>>> It's not Democrats, but at most one Democrat that said such a thing.
>>>
>>> Gavvy Newsom has also made similar remarks. He's talked about amending
>>> the California penal code so that such post-birth abortions won't fall
>>> under the definition of murder, which killing a living baby outside the
>>> womb most certainly is.
> 
>> The "definition of murder" is whatever the state says, by definition.
> 
> Not if it conflicts with the Constitution's guaranteed rights for all
> citizens. You see, after the baby is born, there's no more "rights of
> the mother" to be concerned about, and no more philosophical debates
> about when life begins or whether it's a person or not.
> 
> The state of California can no more exempt the intentional killing of a
> living, 


Do you have any examples of anything remotely like this or are you just 
vomitting up word salad like the true Trump disciple you are?