Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17de0b7574549c17$349846$705664$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 04:05:06 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: If Biden Loses Televised Debate, Can He Be Replaced?
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <v5jusu$2pmlu$1@dont-email.me> <17dd712e093e033e$4759$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <vwSdnaUXHeafQBz7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vjn38jp2gpse1essga7hbglilult4tnfu4@4ax.com> <PCudncK6nb8Ofxz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <39p38jhnhvj2mjdj49e7ca4v97fpfd8in4@4ax.com> <IQydnduIEa-YdBz7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com> <atropos-68FBCD.20401930062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-68FBCD.20401930062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 71
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:05:06 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4014
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17de0b7574549c17$349846$705664$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4410

On 6/30/24 10:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com>,
>   shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 23:23:49 +0000, BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:56:19 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 30, 2024 at 3:40:41 PM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:32:34 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 2024 at 2:57:55 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/28/24 10:49 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <i18t7jdt9idsgamt2nrt6dctolugp38s76@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:01:49 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Earlier this month, Business Insider offered these possible
>>>>>>>>>>> replacements for Biden should he not be the nominee: Kamala
>>>>>>>>>>> Harris, governors Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI),
>>>>>>>>>>> Roy Cooper (D-N.C.), and Wes Moore (D-MD), and senators Amy
>>>>>>>>>>> Klobuchar (D-MN) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The knives are out already.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gavvy Newsom and Hillary were probably watching the debate from their
>>>>>>>>> respective lairs and whispering "Excellent" over their tented fingers
>>>>>>>>> in their best Monty Burns voice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What did they say after your guy Trump claimed (again) that Dems want
>>>>>>>> to kill babies after they're born?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leftists like Hutt are calling what Trump said about "post-birth"
>>>>>>> abortions and Ralph Northam a lie. Here's then-governor of Virginia
>>>>>>> Northam in his own words. You tell me what he's talking about if
>>>>>>> Trump was lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So that one guy represents all Dems?
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump specifically said Northam wanted post-birth abortions. Leftists
>>>>> went nuts and said that was a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's a lie, what is Northam talking about there?
>>>>
>>>> My point is Trump keeps saying Democrats want post-birth abortions.
>>>> It's not Democrats, but at most one Democrat that said such a thing.
>>>
>>> Gavvy Newsom has also made similar remarks. He's talked about amending the
>>> California penal code so that such post-birth abortions won't fall under
>>> the definition of murder, which killing a living baby outside the womb most
>>> certainly is.
>>
>> If the doctors, and the mother think a baby isn't viable is it really
>> that wrong to terminate the baby's life? That's not an abortion. It's
>> the so called mercy killing but one that is or should be done within
>> the law.
> 
> So it's okay to kill retarded people because they won't have a full life
> anyway and they'll just be burden on the parents?


Of course you keep coming back to "shawn."  Don't forget "Rhino," he 
sucks ass too!