Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17df166f901d51fb$2$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:37:30 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Spacetime
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <le0krbF2j9cU1@mid.individual.net> <816c22cd6777f919d255d5b5a98551e6@www.novabbs.com> <le4hgmFk1orU5@mid.individual.net> <aa1b8ce99f8dc2406be92550817af4d7@www.novabbs.com> <lecehcFr3voU9@mid.individual.net> <3d05da1bc3e7044abccacfc8ea78eed4@www.novabbs.com> <lemntiFdpnrU4@mid.individual.net> <d9c04a0ecea25dac5c2c60c6fc3a58fa@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <d9c04a0ecea25dac5c2c60c6fc3a58fa@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 57
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 18:37:31 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2829
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17df166f901d51fb$2$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3231

W dniu 04.07.2024 o 18:39, gharnagel pisze:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>> Am Sonntag000030, 30.06.2024 um 15:03 schrieb gharnagel:
>> >
>> > Thomas Heger wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I dislike stringtheory and had no extension of that theory in mind.
>> >
>> > But M-theory STILL fits that description.  Just because you don't like
>> > it doesn't mean it's false.
>>
>> Sure, but dislike wouldn't proof it neither.
>>
>> 'String theory' is based on 'strings' and those are supposed to be
>> material objects (kind of 'superparticles').
>>
>> But I tried to show, that the particle concept itself is wrong.
> 
> I don't think it's possible to disprove either concept.
> 
>> So, matter needs to be 'relativistic' and made from absolutely nothing.
> 
> Well, the quantum foam idea allows that, but the existence of such
> matter doesn't last long.  I think that disproves that durable matter
> can come from nothing.
> 
>> I had an idea for this to become possible. I just take spacetime of GR
>> for real and assume, that spacetime would consist of kind of 'pointlike
>> elements'.
>>
>> That is something like a point with features and higher dimensions than
>> points in Euclidean space have.
> 
> Frankly, I tend to disbelieve in the concept of spacetime.
> 
>> These 'elements' are connceted multiplicative 'sideways', like a certain
>> equation for quaternions, which is used for rotations.
>>
>> This concept is my own invention, called 'structured spacetime' and
>> needs no strings.
>>
>> It is actually relatively simple and needs only very few unusual
>> assumptions.
>>
>> One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than three
>> dimensions.
> 
> I think points are nonexistent.  They are a mental invention to express
> geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express
> mathematical
> concepts.


Like numbers - nonexistent, right, Har, poor
halfbrain?