Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:44:32 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Spacetime
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <le0krbF2j9cU1@mid.individual.net> <816c22cd6777f919d255d5b5a98551e6@www.novabbs.com> <le4hgmFk1orU5@mid.individual.net> <aa1b8ce99f8dc2406be92550817af4d7@www.novabbs.com> <lecehcFr3voU9@mid.individual.net> <3d05da1bc3e7044abccacfc8ea78eed4@www.novabbs.com> <lemntiFdpnrU4@mid.individual.net> <d9c04a0ecea25dac5c2c60c6fc3a58fa@www.novabbs.com> <17df166f901d51fb$2$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <f2bcb768b53b5b22384d8a727f95be4e@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <f2bcb768b53b5b22384d8a727f95be4e@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 59
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 03:44:31 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2850
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17df34493bf564b0$2$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3252

W dniu 04.07.2024 o 23:10, gharnagel pisze:
> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 04.07.2024 o 18:39, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > Thomas Heger wrote:
>> > >
>> > > But I tried to show, that the particle concept itself is wrong.
>> >
>> > I don't think it's possible to disprove either concept.
>> >
>> > > So, matter needs to be 'relativistic' and made from absolutely
>> nothing.
>> >
>> > Well, the quantum foam idea allows that, but the existence of such
>> > matter doesn't last long.  I think that disproves that durable matter
>> > can come from nothing.
>> >
>> > > I had an idea for this to become possible. I just take spacetime of
>> GR
>> > > for real and assume, that spacetime would consist of kind of
>> 'pointlike
>> > > elements'.
>> > >
>> > > That is something like a point with features and higher dimensions
>> than
>> > > points in Euclidean space have.
>> >
>> > Frankly, I tend to disbelieve in the concept of spacetime.
>> >
>> > > These 'elements' are connceted multiplicative 'sideways', like a
>> certain
>> > > equation for quaternions, which is used for rotations.
>> > >
>> > > This concept is my own invention, called 'structured spacetime' and
>> > > needs no strings.
>> > >
>> > > It is actually relatively simple and needs only very few unusual
>> > > assumptions.
>> > >
>> > > One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than
>> three
>> > > dimensions.
>> >
>> > I think points are nonexistent.  They are a mental invention to
>> express
>> > geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express
>> > mathematical
>> > concepts.
>>
>> Like numbers - nonexistent, right, Har, poor halfbrain?
> 
> Now you're getting the idea.  Good job!


So - you don't believe that there exists the
smallest prime number, right, Har, poor halfbrain?