Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 10:46:28 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: The purpose of science Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <66887E6B.397@ix.netcom.com> <les13bF7uhdU2@mid.individual.net> <17df879faf8c6f0a$657$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <les4lkF8eadU2@mid.individual.net> <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <lev14fFl85bU4@mid.individual.net> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <lev14fFl85bU4@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 41 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 08:46:31 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1964 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2396 W dniu 07.07.2024 o 10:15, Thomas Heger pisze: > Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 08:53 schrieb Maciej Wozniak: > >>>>>> if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks >>>>>> it has >>>>>> a purpose? >>>>>> >>>>> Well, maybe there is a purpose maybe not. >>>>> >>>>> This is a difficult question, but not really for physics. >>>> >>>> For sure, physics is too primitive for serious >>>> subjects. >>>> >>> No, not quite. >> >> Quite. >>> >>> But how would you, for instance, measure 'purpose'? >> >> Sometimes it's necessary to use brain and >> think, making measurements can't substitute >> that. Surprise? > > well, yes, but your brain is not exactly what I would call 'measuring > device'. Good. You shouldn't call it "measuring device", because it is not. And, well, worshipping measuring devices is stupid. Of course, people worshipping measuring devices can't know it is stupid, because their measuring devices can't measure stupidity. Actually, dealing with any serious, advanced terms is out of the range of measuring devices, physics and exact sciences in general. They're too primitive for that.