Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:57:06 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 33
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 12:57:04 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1756
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2175

W dniu 08.07.2024 o 13:11, Python pisze:
> Le 08/07/2024 à 10:57, J. J. Lodder a écrit :
>> Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
>>
>>> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>>> Langevin's paradox.
>>>> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of
>>>> relativity.
>>>
>>> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox".
>>> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox".
>>
>> Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic.
> 
> Lengrand (aka Hachel) is. A quite ridiculous one. Most French
> are not, obviously (look at the election results :-) )
> 
>> Nothing is to be taken seriously
>> unless a French name can be tagged onto it.
> 
> Fact it that the twin paradox has been pointed out first


Neither in France, nor in other countries, neither
between worshippers of your idiot guru nor between
his enemies anyone noticed, that the mumble of
the idiot was obviously inconsistent.

With the approach of "nature is speaking through
our mouth, we don't have to care about mere
definitions of mere humans" - all physicists are
idiots.