Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:57:06 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 33 Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 12:57:04 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1756 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2175 W dniu 08.07.2024 o 13:11, Python pisze: > Le 08/07/2024 à 10:57, J. J. Lodder a écrit : >> Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote: >> >>> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel: >>>> Langevin's paradox. >>>> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of >>>> relativity. >>> >>> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox". >>> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox". >> >> Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic. > > Lengrand (aka Hachel) is. A quite ridiculous one. Most French > are not, obviously (look at the election results :-) ) > >> Nothing is to be taken seriously >> unless a French name can be tagged onto it. > > Fact it that the twin paradox has been pointed out first Neither in France, nor in other countries, neither between worshippers of your idiot guru nor between his enemies anyone noticed, that the mumble of the idiot was obviously inconsistent. With the approach of "nature is speaking through our mouth, we don't have to care about mere definitions of mere humans" - all physicists are idiots.