Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:05:06 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net> <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <17e093318d04c44e$453$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v6jjdn$1dcp9$1@dont-email.me> <17e0956e40b4ac96$539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <v6jm2g$1dcp9$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v6jm2g$1dcp9$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 48
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:05:05 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2173
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2577

W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:47, Python pisze:
> Le 09/07/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze:
>>> Le 09/07/2024 à 16:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> ...
>>>> It is. Apart of mumbling inconsistently -
>>>> the idiot didn't understand what yhe
>>>> human age is, how it is determined and
>>>> that clocks have nothing in common with
>>>> that.
>>>> Of course, an age of a human is determined
>>>> by subtracting his birthdate from the
>>>> current date. It always was.
>>>
>>> *facepalm*
>>>
>>> You stupidity is abysmal Wozniak.
>>>
>>> When a person's age is unknown there are biological
>>> ways to estimate it, you know? 
> 
>> You really think that
>>> these methods are inaccurate?
>>
>> You really think they are not 
> 
> So you cannot answer. No surprise.

You fabricate and lie. No surprise.
> 
> Aging is a biological process.  It matches with stationary> (respectively with the person's body) clocks

No, poor stinker, it doesn't.
No surprise you don't know, of cxourse -
You generally know very little.


> As a matter of fact metabolism is a kind of clock.

No, poor stinker, it is not.
Just like all relativistic morons
you don't know what a clock is.

And determining of age is still
- subtracting dates. That a fanatic
piece of shit doesn't like it
changes  nothing.