Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:05:06 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net> <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <17e093318d04c44e$453$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v6jjdn$1dcp9$1@dont-email.me> <17e0956e40b4ac96$539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <v6jm2g$1dcp9$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v6jm2g$1dcp9$2@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 48 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:05:05 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2173 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2577 W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:47, Python pisze: > Le 09/07/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze: >>> Le 09/07/2024 à 16:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > ... >>>> It is. Apart of mumbling inconsistently - >>>> the idiot didn't understand what yhe >>>> human age is, how it is determined and >>>> that clocks have nothing in common with >>>> that. >>>> Of course, an age of a human is determined >>>> by subtracting his birthdate from the >>>> current date. It always was. >>> >>> *facepalm* >>> >>> You stupidity is abysmal Wozniak. >>> >>> When a person's age is unknown there are biological >>> ways to estimate it, you know? > >> You really think that >>> these methods are inaccurate? >> >> You really think they are not > > So you cannot answer. No surprise. You fabricate and lie. No surprise. > > Aging is a biological process. It matches with stationary> (respectively with the person's body) clocks No, poor stinker, it doesn't. No surprise you don't know, of cxourse - You generally know very little. > As a matter of fact metabolism is a kind of clock. No, poor stinker, it is not. Just like all relativistic morons you don't know what a clock is. And determining of age is still - subtracting dates. That a fanatic piece of shit doesn't like it changes nothing.