Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 20:46:54 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net> <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <v6mlhe$21277$2@dont-email.me> <9oTvw4-YSIPb1dubtdBwcc_MeX8@jntp> <v6ojjl$2fb4i$1@dont-email.me> <oifv2gv8lSmpEE3OlZ7h_aGUb_Q@jntp> <v6r5of$30t0t$1@dont-email.me> <LdiOEXosVQBwmzyUbXQtBoNVQOg@jntp> <v715id$8suh$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v715id$8suh$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 34
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 18:46:54 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1892
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e228c05a86a254$105270$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2299

W dniu 14.07.2024 o 20:36, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 12.07.2024 15:44, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> Le 12/07/2024 à 13:58, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>
>>> It is experimentally proved that no accelerator would work
>>> if charged particles didn't behave _exactly_ as predicted by SR.
>>>
>>> Doctor Richard Hachel's theory predicts that protons behave
>>> very differently from what SR predicts.
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> Doctor Richard Hachel's theory is experimentally falsified.
>>
>> No.
> 
> 
> To test a theory, you must calculate what the theory
> predicts will be measured in an experiment.
> 
> Then you do the experiment, and see if the values
> read of the instrument are in accordance with the prediction
> within the precision of the measurement.


No need for that, of course, in the
case of the mumble your idiot guru; as
his predictions deny each other - at
least one of them must be denied by the
measurement...
Not even talking about - how primitive
and naive Popper's tales of "falsification"
are.