| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:16:56 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp> <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp> <f21b77862f36ab6a27fd237fda9661f8@www.novabbs.com> <Rsj9fwaYx7xWTx_LjgnuDLRLG0M@jntp> <6f498e8663ec0b05b9cd9e03df9b4de4@www.novabbs.com> <tWsKauuW6XViPa1OVHe8GAFt0pY@jntp> <0cb92f486425b83cdc71dbdea3093427@www.novabbs.com> <2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp> <40a7f3651fa003ba04b12ddd79ee55b1@www.novabbs.com> <lfp8pbFkr1mU1@mid.individual.net> <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 48 Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!nntp.terraraq.uk!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:16:56 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2916 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3414 W dniu 17.07.2024 o 14:05, gharnagel pisze: > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 7:05:15 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: >> >> Am Dienstag000016, 16.07.2024 um 16:47 schrieb gharnagel: >> > >> > "Why is the speed of light so slow when the universe is such a really, >> > really big place?" -- G. L. Harnagel >> >> This is a tautology: >> >> What we see in the night sky is actually our own past light-cone. > > Ah, but if we can develop tachyon astronomy, that will not be true! > >> This means: light is relatively slow for the wastness of the universe, >> hence we can see everything only with a certain delay and the further >> away, the longer the delay, according to x = c* t >> (with x= distance in meters, t = delay in seconds). >> >> This 'longer away' is usually measured in light years and the delay in >> years. >> >> Since the night sky shows only a delayed image of past events, the speed >> of light cancels out of the equations and we can put any value into it >> and always get a valid picture of the universe. >> >> So we only assume, that light moves always with ~300 million meters per >> second through the entire universe. >> >> But if light would speed up or slow down, we would not be able to >> measure this, because we always see the own light cone in the night sky >> and c is already embedded into it (for whatever a value c actually has >> in outer space). >> >> TH > > Ah, but the fine structure constant, which is pertinent to how stars > shine, > includes the speed of light. That implies that c is the same throughout > space and time, n'est-ce pas? c is a constant, poor halfbrain. Of course it is the same. As for the speed of light - even your idiot guru was unable to stick to such an absurd for a long time, and his GR shit had to abandon it