| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17e3f1f35ae2592b$81415$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:25:10 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: tau egality in relalivity Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <D5sf4f-nI4z2kOO5eZjIDNurKmQ@jntp> <v7eo50$35ppm$1@dont-email.me> <xwzk4QdnflJrlwzJfXWvzXJaPy8@jntp> <v7gg0a$3hi7e$1@dont-email.me> <17e3f12140828598$20443$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 37 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 14:25:10 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1911 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e3f1f35ae2592b$81415$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2254 W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:14, Python pisze: > Le 20/07/2024 à 16:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:01, Python pisze: >>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:47, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:08, Python a écrit : >>> >>> As usual you've snipped my argument and do not even try to >>> address it (because you know that you can, I'd guess) >>> >>>> If two travelers leave at the same time, and arrive at the same >>>> time, it goes without saying that the improper times will be equal. >>>> This is the very definition of logical thinking. >>> >>> Using as a condition something that is always true is definitely NOT >>> a logical way of thinking. >>> >>>> [snip repetition of the same babbling] >>> >>> >>>> You refute violently because you have read Einstein and Minkowski. >>> >>> I'm not using anything from SR, Einstein or Minkowski in my >>> argument. > > >> BTW, read what Poincare wrote about non >> euclidean geometries in "science and >> hypothesis" > > I did. We've already talked about that. Your point is wrong. Well, that's a shitty, impudent lie, but nothing worse than your usual level, poor stinker.