Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17e3f1f35ae2592b$81415$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:25:10 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: tau egality in relalivity
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <D5sf4f-nI4z2kOO5eZjIDNurKmQ@jntp> <v7eo50$35ppm$1@dont-email.me> <xwzk4QdnflJrlwzJfXWvzXJaPy8@jntp> <v7gg0a$3hi7e$1@dont-email.me> <17e3f12140828598$20443$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 37
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 14:25:10 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1911
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e3f1f35ae2592b$81415$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2254

W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:14, Python pisze:
> Le 20/07/2024 à 16:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:01, Python pisze:
>>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:47, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:08, Python a écrit :
>>>
>>> As usual you've snipped my argument and do not even try to
>>> address it (because you know that you can, I'd guess)
>>>
>>>> If two travelers leave at the same time, and arrive at the same 
>>>> time, it goes without saying that the improper times will be equal. 
>>>> This is the very definition of logical thinking.
>>>
>>> Using as a condition something that is always true is definitely NOT
>>> a logical way of thinking.
>>>
>>>> [snip repetition of the same babbling]
>>>
>>>
>>>> You refute violently because you have read Einstein and Minkowski.
>>>
>>> I'm not using anything from SR, Einstein or Minkowski in my
>>> argument.
> 
> 
>> BTW, read what Poincare wrote about non
>> euclidean geometries in "science  and
>> hypothesis"
> 
> I did. We've already talked about that. Your point is wrong.

Well, that's a shitty, impudent lie, but
nothing worse than your usual level, poor
stinker.