Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:52:54 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: tau egality in relalivity
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <D5sf4f-nI4z2kOO5eZjIDNurKmQ@jntp> <v7eo50$35ppm$1@dont-email.me> <xwzk4QdnflJrlwzJfXWvzXJaPy8@jntp> <v7gg0a$3hi7e$1@dont-email.me> <17e3f12140828598$20443$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v7ggo2$3hi7e$6@dont-email.me> <17e3f1f35ae2592b$81415$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <v7ghhj$3hi7e$8@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <v7ghhj$3hi7e$8@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 54
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 14:52:55 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2642
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e3f3770e3fb0df$20444$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2985

W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:28, Python pisze:
> Le 20/07/2024 à 16:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:14, Python pisze:
>>> Le 20/07/2024 à 16:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> W dniu 20.07.2024 o 16:01, Python pisze:
>>>>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:47, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :
>>>>>> Le 20/07/2024 à 00:08, Python a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual you've snipped my argument and do not even try to
>>>>> address it (because you know that you can, I'd guess)
>>>>>
>>>>>> If two travelers leave at the same time, and arrive at the same 
>>>>>> time, it goes without saying that the improper times will be 
>>>>>> equal. This is the very definition of logical thinking.
>>>>>
>>>>> Using as a condition something that is always true is definitely NOT
>>>>> a logical way of thinking.
>>>>>
>>>>>> [snip repetition of the same babbling]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You refute violently because you have read Einstein and Minkowski.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not using anything from SR, Einstein or Minkowski in my
>>>>> argument.
>>>
>>>
>>>> BTW, read what Poincare wrote about non
>>>> euclidean geometries in "science  and
>>>> hypothesis"
>>>
>>> I did. We've already talked about that. Your point is wrong.
>>
>> Well, that's [snip profanities] lie, but
>> nothing [snip whining]
> 
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/09w_O2XOEik/m/IloTCV6JEgAJ
> 
> So no, it is not a lie.

Of course it is, and a very stinky one.
And completely idiotic, as well.
The alternatives considered by P were:

"we could give up Euclidean geometry,
or modify the laws of optics, and suppose that
light is not rigorously propagated in a straight line."

Trying to pretend that the choice of your idiot
guru was NOT "give up EG" - is, well, even worse
than your usual level.