| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17e4375261f22dd0$138296$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 13:36:24 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <v6pdg9$2k01g$1@dont-email.me> <lfer0bF3dlmU1@mid.individual.net> <v708nu$3mln$1@dont-email.me> <lfjtovFqneaU1@mid.individual.net> <v72oo9$ko8j$1@dont-email.me> <lfmlkfF7umpU10@mid.individual.net> <v786b8$1psia$1@dont-email.me> <lfrqhlF22urU3@mid.individual.net> <E89td6du78wfm2OXKZAD6KQeYyY@jntp> <lfut2kFfohpU9@mid.individual.net> <rp2ObOnNm5Uis6lq153gZKZa-KM@jntp> <lg13i1Fq3poU8@mid.individual.net> <v7ggcp$3hi7e$3@dont-email.me> <lg3q51F8fpmU6@mid.individual.net> <v7ioj3$101u$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v7ioj3$101u$2@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 47 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:36:24 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2607 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e4375261f22dd0$138296$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3020 W dniu 21.07.2024 o 12:40, Python pisze: > Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python: >> ... >>>> The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, >>>> hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of >>>> science. >>>> >>>> Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful. >>>> >>>> But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts??? >>>> >>>> Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would >>>> be told about it. >>> >>> Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth, >>> Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how >>> stupid your claims are? >>> >>> There is a far simpler way to explain everything >>> - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article >> >> This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'! >> >> You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+ >> errors I have found in Einstein's paper. >> >> Here it is: >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view >> >> If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at >> least a single one. > > Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively > debunked here, by me and others. > Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid would be, and he has written it clearly enough for anyone able to read (even if not clearly enough for you, poor stinker).