Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17e766a84852fb85$86725$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 22:37:35 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Energy?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <Energy-20240728103722@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <66A8307B.8B6@ix.netcom.com> <9U6dneBCi4_A_DX7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <66A9CBC9.2213@ix.netcom.com> <66a9ef78$1$8237$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <17e73ef78c331cc1$123024$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <7c859ee125873c07a6e93c2ff0fa5099@www.novabbs.com> <66aa8a2c$0$18432$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <66aa8a2c$0$18432$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 33
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:37:35 +0000
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e766a84852fb85$86725$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 2135
Bytes: 2262

W dniu 31.07.2024 o 21:02, J. J. Lodder pisze:
> gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 31.07.2024 o 10:02, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>>>>
>>>> A somewhat jocular, but practical working proper definition is:
>>>> Energy is 1/2 m v^2, and everything else that is missing from the law
>>> of
>>>> conservation of energy.
>>>
>>> And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged
>>> "law of nature" is really a simple language truism
>>> (and it's not a critique, just stating the fact).
>>
>> So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a
>> law?  Maybe he has noticed that his own energy gone
>> down the toilet?
> 
> Yes, a complete lack of understanding of what it is all about,
> in his case.
> You may use the law of conservation of energy
> to discover new and as yet unknown forms of energy.


Tell me, poor halfbrain - do you think
your so called "law" is "falsifiable" with
the definition above?