Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17e766a84852fb85$86725$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 22:37:35 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Energy? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <Energy-20240728103722@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <66A8307B.8B6@ix.netcom.com> <9U6dneBCi4_A_DX7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <66A9CBC9.2213@ix.netcom.com> <66a9ef78$1$8237$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <17e73ef78c331cc1$123024$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <7c859ee125873c07a6e93c2ff0fa5099@www.novabbs.com> <66aa8a2c$0$18432$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <66aa8a2c$0$18432$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 33 Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:37:35 +0000 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e766a84852fb85$86725$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> X-Received-Bytes: 2135 Bytes: 2262 W dniu 31.07.2024 o 21:02, J. J. Lodder pisze: > gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>> >>> W dniu 31.07.2024 o 10:02, J. J. Lodder pisze: >>>> >>>> A somewhat jocular, but practical working proper definition is: >>>> Energy is 1/2 m v^2, and everything else that is missing from the law >>> of >>>> conservation of energy. >>> >>> And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged >>> "law of nature" is really a simple language truism >>> (and it's not a critique, just stating the fact). >> >> So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a >> law? Maybe he has noticed that his own energy gone >> down the toilet? > > Yes, a complete lack of understanding of what it is all about, > in his case. > You may use the law of conservation of energy > to discover new and as yet unknown forms of energy. Tell me, poor halfbrain - do you think your so called "law" is "falsifiable" with the definition above?