Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17e914f508c7a9cf$96455$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 10:02:54 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> Subject: "Time" vs "physical time" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 14 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2024 08:02:55 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 849 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e914f508c7a9cf$96455$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 1254 When a real person in the real world says "time" - he/she doesn't refer to your mystical crap at all. The word usually means one of zone times or UTC; TAI is referred rarely, but it is still important. NONE of them is observer dependent. That's why The Shit is opposed so fiercely by "laymen". Whet they refer as "time" simply doesn't have those absurd properties invented by your idiot guru for pseudotime he liked.