Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17e9a9478a391c46$205292$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 07:20:58 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Subject: Does Lobachevsky's V axiom deny Euclid's V axiom
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 05:20:57 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 764
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e9a9478a391c46$205292$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1191


Well, they're practically  negation of each other.
And you won't find a rule "not p is not necessarily
denying p" in mathematics - but it is an usual component
of pseudophilosophies concocted by morons for excusing
both their inconsistencies and plain lies.

So - the question is as in the topic. What do you think?