Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17e9c96c37b23ec8$138557$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 17:10:00 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com> <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me> <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me> <QV9CDTycOcQmvSfs_5DMN5TUrWY@jntp> <QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 36 Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 15:09:59 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2099 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e9c96c37b23ec8$138557$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2463 W dniu 08.08.2024 o 16:56, Python pisze: > Le 08/08/2024 à 16:52, Richard Hachel a écrit : >> Le 08/08/2024 à 13:17, Python a écrit : >>> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : >> >>>> Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski. >>> >>> This is true. >> >> No, it's true. > > "no" then "it's true"? > >> When Henri Poincaré (blessed be he and honored be his holy memory >> before the divine Word) wrote his transformations, he gave one of the >> most beautiful mathematical poems in the universe. >> These transformations that Lorentz searched for years without ever >> finding them are admirable. >> Now, we must interpret this PHYSICALLY. >> It is not by jumping like a kid like Python, shouting: "Poincaré is >> beautiful, Poincaré is brilliant, Poincaré was a God in mathematics" >> that we will get there. > > As if you had the mathematical competence to understand Poincaré! You Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid would be, and he has written it clearly enough for anyone able to read (even if not clearly enough for you, poor stinker). It's you who has no competence to understand P. You've demonstrated it very well.