| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17eac056d70b4f10$18545$1305650$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
From: Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> Subject: Re: Proprietary Software Is A Racket Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy References: <17eaa8b974a82509$11045$1084599$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <66b8b2df$0$8237$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 52 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:34:46 +0000 Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:34:46 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2565 Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com Message-Id: <17eac056d70b4f10$18545$1305650$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> Bytes: 2899 On 11 Aug 2024 12:47:27 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > > An IT engineer cost something like $1500 a day (in France, I believe > it's more in the US). So paying $200 per month for being able to have > responses in case of need is nothing compared to hire someone full time > in case of need. > Listen, idiot. I am not referring to huge enterprise packages like an airline reservation system or an ERP serving hundreds of global locations. In such cases an expensive maintenance contract is certainly warranted. I am referring to simple and common packages like Adobe Photoshop or AutoCAD. These packages were once sold at the corner office supply store for a one-time, perpetual license. The only gimmick was the fabricated yearly "updates" that were intended to to keep the revenue flowing, but any user could choose to skip the updates completely. As any programmer knows, software lasts forever. Such simple programs require no maintenance or updates. Software companies, however, do not last forever. Thus, a gimmick of some kind is always necessary to ensure continued sales. Adobe was the first to introduce the gimmick of the "software subscription." The result was that revenue was doubled at the cost of doing absolutely nothing. Needless to say, every other commercial software company followed suit. I am aware of some moron who pays over $1600 annually for a subscription to AutoDesk. When I asked why he wants to waste his money like that his response was that he is obtaining all the security updates. What a clown! He has completely fallen for that bullshit ruse. There is no cure for stupidity. Software lasts forever. I have written programs years ago that are still working normally with no updates whatsoever. But any software company would soon be bankrupt and out of business if they followed that model. To keep the sales flowing they must invent reasons that will fool the ignorant masses -- and they do. FOSS, however, is not in business and thus is the natural and superior choice.