Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 04:20:51 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Placed on Terror Watch List After Criticizing Biden/Harris Admin
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <qdWcnVtAVZ_w6yf7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <585lbj5ghnhj1t62oklmqr48n6dktajqfm@4ax.com> <atropos-D5FF13.16132312082024@news.giganews.com> <3qklbj9efj08b9r9cuf1d12i3jeho2dli0@4ax.com> <mKKdndDCBc5BRSf7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v9fve4$3uvrs$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-3929F0.10515813082024@news.giganews.com> <v9gann$13f2$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-D1D01A.12201313082024@news.giganews.com> <v9gdqn$1vj8$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-EE24D4.13250713082024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-EE24D4.13250713082024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 93
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:20:51 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 5336
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17eb8dda6cd3b701$15$1999369$50d51a61@news.newsdemon.com>

On 8/13/24 3:25 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v9gdqn$1vj8$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/13/2024 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v9gann$13f2$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/13/2024 1:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v9fve4$3uvrs$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/12/2024 11:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2024 at 8:31:13 PM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 16:13:23 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <585lbj5ghnhj1t62oklmqr48n6dktajqfm@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>      shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:55:57 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>      wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>>      >In article <v9dv7t$3fq89$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>      > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>>>>>      >> On 8/12/2024 4:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>      >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Immediately after going on national TV and criticizing the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biden/Harris administration, former Congresswoman Tulsi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gabbard was placed on TSA's Quiet Skies terror watchlist, which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> subjects her to FAM surveillance, bomb dog screening, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggressive pat downs and luggage screening every time she boards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a flight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RJBygvtNfSY&pp=ygUaTWF0dCB0YWliYm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> k6IHR1bHNpIGdhYmJhcmQ%3D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you watch your own video? The outrage here (if there is one)
>>>>>>>>>>>> is that such a hidden haphazard watchlist exists, and not that
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gabbard would somehow get placed on it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There can be more than one outrage.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted Kennedy was on such a list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was accidentally placed on it because he had a common name. How
>>>>>>>>>>> many other Tulsi Gabbards are out there, do you suppose, that
>>>>>>>>>>> could make the same excuse here even remotely credible?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And Kennedy's list was one for actual suspected terrorists and so
>>>>>>>>>>> had some basic justification for its existence. Quiet Skies is
>>>>>>>>>>> apparently for anyone the government merely deems problematic.
>>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>>> And it looks like it was created during the Trump administration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then he should have to answer for it. As should Biden/Harris (they're
>>>>>>>>> one and the same these days) for Gabbard's placement on it. Or any of
>>>>>>>>> the people from Jan. 6 who are on it merely because they attended
>>>>>>>>> Trump's speech on the Ellipse that day and never went near the
>>>>>>>>> Capitol.
>>>>>>>>> That's actually an impeachable-level offense as far as I'm concerned.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wouldn't that depend upon who made the decision to add her to the
>>>>>>>> list. It's one thing if the President was to have made the decision
>>>>>>>> but what if it was someone in the TSA that decided to add those names
>>>>>>>> to the list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has the president fired that person? If not, we can assume he endorses
>>>>>>> that decision and he should therefore be impeached.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nonsense. If the President fired that person, "we" would assume he's
>>>>>> merely trying to hide his endorsement and should therefore be impeached.
>>>>>
>>>>> As usual, I have no idea what you're talking about.
>>>>
>>>> You're pretending that there's some action the President could take that
>>>> would pry you from your latest conspiracy theory.
>>>
>>> Ah, so you're pretending to read my mind again. Gotcha.
>>
>> No reading necessary.  It screams aloud.
> 
> Nope. I never said the things you claim, so you must be doing another of
> your Kreskin acts. On the other hand, Kreskin actually gave the correct
> answers, so I don't know if that's really the best comparison for
> whatever it is you're pretending to do.


So mpig was incorrect?  As usual, instead of clearly stating that, you 
danced around it in a dainty, drag queen fashion.