Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:50:18 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Space-time interval (2)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp> <AVa827R_LOez7mc5Ad3CT6GyhiA@jntp> <327c4ebc77dc16239ac38f00b508451b@www.novabbs.com> <17eb7db913381cc9$330199$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <ZmtVAt4HhKe0jdT-a3px1duKdmw@jntp> <v9i8c5$bvnu$9@dont-email.me> <VOohu46_lYfs6YEQG8qZQKYepNw@jntp> <v9ia7k$bvnu$11@dont-email.me> <FxxcAtB-BaU4TzfE-6Txlbo_gEA@jntp> <a610865812a2359182345fca40704d24@www.novabbs.com> <rKEMuc92iR5UV2SK1N1T-iZebzM@jntp> <ca24c2f588c95528f26e6aafe368ee31@www.novabbs.com> <17ebabcfbfa36128$252843$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <28381a9633b0982dfd8a2e1f1ae183c8@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <28381a9633b0982dfd8a2e1f1ae183c8@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 84
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:50:18 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3761
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ebb033bb9aa6b9$264648$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4125

W dniu 14.08.2024 o 21:20, gharnagel pisze:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:29:51 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 14.08.2024 o 20:11, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:37:09 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Le 14/08/2024 à 16:39, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>> > > >
>> > > > Actually, time passes MORE quickly at the satellite.
>> "Chronotropy" is
>> > > > a canard.  The rate of the satellite clock is set to run slow so
>> that
>> > > > it is observed to run at the proper rate on the earth.  The reason
>> why
>> > > > the satellite must be updated is because (1) the satellite is not
>> in
>> > > > an exactly circular orbit and (2) the earth does not have a
>> uniform
>> > > > density.
>> > > >
>> > > > Someone (I'm not naming any names) needs to do some studying.
>> > >
>> > > This is a very interesting post.
>> > > It asks a question: "How is it that the satellite, which apparently
>> goes
>> > > faster than the earth, has a time that passes faster, contrary to
>> what
>> > > SR predicts?"
>> >
>> > Because, of course, it's GR.
>> >
>> > > We answer it as we can, today, the answer is that it seems that
>> > > apparently, gravitation slows down time.
>>
>> > It's not just "apparent": it's confirmed by experiment.
>>
>> Bullshit,
> 
> Yes, that describes what Wozniak does very well.
> 
>> anyone can check - time (as defined by your idiot guru himself)
> 
> Ah, Wozniak proves once again that HE is the one who slanders and
> insults.
> 
>> is galilean, with the precision of an acceptable error.
> 
> Refuted by copious experimental evidence:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Experimental_testing_3
> 
> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/einsteins-time-dilation-prediction-verified/
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_testing_of_time_dilation#Experiments
> 
> Only liars or fools protest this factual evidence.
> 
>> Your bunch of idiots
> 
> Wozniak proves once again that HE is the one who slanders and insults.
> 
>> is trying to lie that the indications of clocks ere not equal,
> 
> No one is saying the indications aren't equal.  Wozniak is wrong about
> that.
> 
>> but asking you what they are then - results
>> only in insults and slanders. Lies have
>> short legs, poor trash.
> 
> No insults, slanders or lies on this side of the table. 

Insults, lies and slkanders are all the
Einstein's worship[pers have on their
side of table. And your post is just
another example, poor trash.



  Wozniak is
> projecting
> again.  His posts have the shortest legs of all.