| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17ec3405e4af90ba$368247$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:05:56 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Sync two clocks Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <17ec3040cf2f4e8f$429420$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <v9nbq8$1d2us$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <v9nbq8$1d2us$2@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 80 Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:05:57 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3247 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17ec3405e4af90ba$368247$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3603 W dniu 16.08.2024 o 13:05, Python pisze: > Le 16/08/2024 à 12:56, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> W dniu 16.08.2024 o 12:47, Python pisze: >>> Le 15/08/2024 à 21:38, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >>>> >>>> The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag >>>> behind the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal phenomenon >>>> that will affect all the watches in the universe. >>>> >>>>> How naive is it possible to be? >>>> >>>>> You don't sync two clocks to each other, you sync one clock >>>> to another clock. >>>> >>>> You still don't understand. >>> >>> You completely messed up your quotes above. Anyway... >>> >>> You're probably a bit intellectually challenged to understand a >>> procedure that is fairly simple, just as you were in 2007 when you >>> miserably demonstrated it back then: >>> >>> https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ >>> >>> If the meaning of t_A, t_B, and t'_A are still unknown to you, you can >>> refer to Einstein 1905 article. >>> >>> t_A is the time shown by clock A when a light signal is emitted; >>> >>> t_B is the time shown by clock B when the signal is received and >>> re-emitted; >>> >>> t'_A is the time shown by clock A when the returned signal is received. >>> >>> Given that your stubbornness in not wanting to understand what you don't >>> get at the first reading is even stronger than your stupidity (which is >>> saying something!), I doubt you'll even try to comprehend. However, here >>> are a few intermediate exercises to help you understand what most people >>> grasp on the first try: >>> >>> 1. Using the hypothesis (confirmed by experiment) that: >> >> A lie,[snip whining] - >> the hypothesis was no way confirmed. > > A Review of One-Way and Two-Way Experiments to Test the Isotropy of the > Speed of Light > > Md. Farid Ahmed, Brendan M. Quine, Stoyan Sargoytchev, A. D. Stauffer > > https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1318 I could as well write those experiments are testing and confirming the advantage of communism over rotten capitalism. But they don't. > >> But it was a self-denying absurd instead. > > Because you say so? Because that's a VERY simple consequence of a definition, in the time you're talking about - in the time when your idiot guru lived and mumbled - valid also for his moronic church. Unfortunately there is nothing absurd into light > speed two-way experiments to confirm it to be invariant. Oh, yes, it is. You're an idiot, so you're unable to notice. > > >