Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17ed7d30c4e76fab$456468$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:38:01 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Sync two clocks Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me> <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp> <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me> <Zwwc8OsxqpAwTzvPkie6NmgxmY8@jntp> <va1tp9$3c0qh$1@dont-email.me> <lvwOM_tj8NJtPtaduqcmSRprOtk@jntp> <va2b62$3c12c$15@dont-email.me> <gQSP7T04xKx9wgapoySeijcbJi4@jntp> <va2cu7$3c12c$17@dont-email.me> <-RLU4Hb-vC0H6CrJfdC09_wtGwc@jntp> <va2fsa$3c12c$22@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <va2fsa$3c12c$22@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 30 Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!news.neodome.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:38:00 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1862 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17ed7d30c4e76fab$456468$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2247 W dniu 20.08.2024 o 18:22, Python pisze: > Le 20/08/2024 à 18:18, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit : >> Le 20/08/2024 à 17:32, Python a écrit : >> >>>> In short, for A, tB and tA' are simultaneous. >>>> I repeat, for A, tB and tA' are simultaneous. >>> >>> Numbers like t_B or t'_A cannot be "simultaneous". Events >>> like e1 = "B sends back a light signal to A" or e2 = "A receives >>> this signal" can be. >>> >>> If this is what you meant, which is likely, then, according >>> to Einstein-Poincaré *definition* of simultaneity: >>> >>> e1 and e2 are NOT simultaneous for A (nor for B) >> >> No. > > According to Einstein-Poincaré definition of simultaneity > they are not simultaneous. > > However you like or not this *definition* this is something > you CANNOT deny. > > A definition cannot be false. If your idiot guru defined a cow as a 6 leg small animal with chitine armour - would it be "not false" to you as well, poor halfbrain?