| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<17ee20164a89a38e$476327$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 20:23:07 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <b1b968956f794d0e91a151e2c1647f4b@www.novabbs.com> <17ee1be73899ea88$501522$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <afa7609a0e7b5f7d66e1e874b551ccfb@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <afa7609a0e7b5f7d66e1e874b551ccfb@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 61 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:23:07 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2640 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17ee20164a89a38e$476327$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3047 W dniu 22.08.2024 o 19:56, gharnagel pisze: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:06:27 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 22.08.2024 o 18:47, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:12:33 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> > > >> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second >> > > As seen, the definition of second loved so >> > > much to be invoked by relativistic morons - >> > >> > Proof here that Wozniak is the one who slanders. >> > >> > > wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru >> > > lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary >> > > 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics. >> > > >> > > Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt >> > > solar system is measuring the length >> > > of solar day. What is the result predicted >> > > by the Einsteinian physics? >> > > One prediction is - 99766. From the >> > > postulates. The second prediction is - >> > > 86400. From definition. >> > > And similiarly with the prediction of >> > > a measurement of a meridian. >> > >> > Is this supposed to be Wozniak's so-called >> > "proof" that relativity is "inconsistent? >> > Wozniak conflates a moving observer with a >> > stationary observer >> >> A lie, > > No, it's not a lie. Wozniak is projecting his > own dishonesty. Yes, it is. There is just one observer in the example. > >> as expected from a relativistic idiot in >> general and from Harrie especially, > > And proof that Wozniak is the one who slanders > and insults. > >> one observer present here, a moving (wrt >> Solar System) one. > > Nope. The moving observer doesn't see two > different results. He doesn't see anything, he is gedanken, you know, poor halfbrain. The matter is not what he sees, the matter is what the physics of your idiot guru is predicting he would see, and it is providing 2 denying itself values, because it is inconsistent.