Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:28:34 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <Zwwc8OsxqpAwTzvPkie6NmgxmY8@jntp> <va1tp9$3c0qh$1@dont-email.me> <aeuL_3xao9-_kSf51ssMUTgW-s8@jntp> <va6rjs$c7ca$1@dont-email.me> <66c6fe9d$0$3360$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <va72t9$blq6$4@dont-email.me> <omIg9w0Iy0ZX5hSc9cLG74AlKY0@jntp> <f15x-DXi9mk6sbBPa_gf0bWPArc@jntp> <va7veu$hfcs$1@dont-email.me> <Kjl4WjK9KQqBWo5XbMcErn2fRTY@jntp> <va9rek$t321$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <va9rek$t321$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 63
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-2.netnews.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:28:34 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3515
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ee5b51c61e1e43$481522$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3859

W dniu 23.08.2024 o 13:23, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
> Den 22.08.2024 21:12, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> Le 22/08/2024 à 20:19, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>
>>> It is no absolute and universal simultaneity.
>>>
>>> Since you still seem to think that it was Richard Hachel
>>> who  discovered this, it is obvious that you do not read
>>> what I and others write to you.
>>>
>>> Den 22.08.2024 Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>> |
>>> | And you believe it is YOU that have discovered that? 😂
>>> |
>>> | Before 1905 everybody believed it was a "universal, present now",
>>> | that simultaneity was absolute, and that clocks could be
>>> | absolutely synchronised. Newton took it for granted!
>>> |
>>> | But Einstein showed that there is no absolute simultaneity,
>>> | and clocks can't be absolutely synchronised.
>>> |
>>> | https://paulba.no/paper/Electrodynamics.pdf
>>> | See: § 1. Definition of Simultaneity
>>> |
>>> | Did you really not know that it was Einstein who discovered this? 😂
>>>
> 
>>
>> Let's admit it, Paul.
>> You're wrong, Einstein didn't say anything at all, and always just 
>> repeated what Poincaré said, but hey, it doesn't matter, we'll admit 
>> that you're right.
> 
> https://paulba.no/paper/Electrodynamics.pdf
> Quote from § 1. Definition of Simultaneity:
> -------------------------------------------
> "If at the point A of space there is a clock, an observer at
>   A can determine the time values of events in the immediate
>   proximity of A by finding the positions of the hands which
>   are simultaneous with these events.
>   If there is at the point B of space another clock in all
>   respects resembling the one at A, it is possible for an observer
>   at B to determine the time values of events in the immediate
>   neighbourhood of B.
>   But it is not possible without further assumption to compare,
>   in respect of time, an event at A with an event at B.
>   We have so far defined only an “A time” and a “B time.”
>   We have not defined a common “time” for A and B, for
>   the latter cannot be defined at all unless we establish
>   by definition that the “time” required by light to travel
>   from A to B equals the “time” it requires to travel from B to A.
> "

As you said not so long:

 > Of course "simultaneity" and "synchronism" are man made,
 > theoretical notions, but they are very practical, and
 > the world would be even more chaotic than it is without it.

Well, the gedankenwelt of your idiot guru,
thanks to his incredible stupidity,
is even more chaotic than the reality.