Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:48:24 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <b1b968956f794d0e91a151e2c1647f4b@www.novabbs.com> <17ee1be73899ea88$501522$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <afa7609a0e7b5f7d66e1e874b551ccfb@www.novabbs.com> <17ee20164a89a38e$476327$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <9580dde8354474f0770030f927756491@www.novabbs.com> <17ee4111f31b308b$545571$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 49
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:48:27 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2353
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2760

W dniu 23.08.2024 o 14:44, gharnagel pisze:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 4:27:34 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 23.08.2024 o 01:31, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 18:23:07 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Yes, it is. There is just one observer in the
>> > > example.
>> >
>> > If there's only one observer, then there is no
>> > observation of two intervals of time.
>>
>> Sure there is no observation. Like usually in a
>> gedanken.
> 
> Wozniak just asserted that there is ONE observer
> and now that there is no observation, so HE is
> being inconsistent.


Harrie mumbles some delusions like an idiot
he is.

>> There are still 2 denying themself predictions
>> of observation derivable
> 
> And he's being inconsistent again.  And he's dead
> wrong anyway: a thought experiment can have as
> many observers as desired

"As many as desired" is one in this case.
It's mine thought experiment so I know
for sure how many observers are desired
in it, it is one.


..  He is desiring only
> one observer when, in fact, he has set up a sham
> situation:  arguing a definition against an
> observation.

The thread is not about any observations. They
are irrelevant.
Its about claims of The Shit of your idiot guru,
spoken directly by the idiot or derivable other
way, for instance from definitions.