Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 17:38:53 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9580dde8354474f0770030f927756491@www.novabbs.com> <17ee4111f31b308b$545571$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com> <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com> <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 75
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3743
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4171

W dniu 25.08.2024 o 17:21, gharnagel pisze:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 14:24:49 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 25.08.2024 o 16:02, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > :)) Wozniak is caught in his dishonesty again and projects it
>> > away from himself.  It is a logical extension of what he
>> > deviously asserted:  Einstein was to stupid to define the
>> > second; therefore, anyone who doesn't define the second is
>> > stupid.
>>
>> No, Harmagel. It's not any logical extension,
>> it's just utterly ridiculous claim o a
>> cornered idiot.
> 
> Wozniak is projecting again,  He's the one that has painted
> himself into a corner.
> 
>> So, what was the definition
> 
> I gave it

A lie, as expected from a piece of relativistic
shit. Once again, trash: what was the definition
of second valid in the physics of your idiot guru
(1905 - to his death)?
Will you finally write it? No. Instead you will
write more lies, more slanders, more absurd dodges.


>> Harmagel is grasping at straws again in a sorry attempt to
>> distract from the elephant in the room.
> 
> This is infantile copycatting.  Not worthy of any more response.
> 
>> I wasn't asking about the current definition of second,
> 
> That's the only one there is.

Not quite. The older ones are also mentioned
there.

>> I was asking about the definition valid in his idiotic
>> physiccs in 1905 and up to the death of his idiot guru.
>> Will you finally write it?
>> Of course, not.
> 
> Because there is no such thing.

So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?



>> > His assertion that relativity is inconsistent because it
>> > predicts that a moving observer would see a day on earth
>> > as 99766 seconds instead of 86400
>>
>> Not "instead" but "both". That's what inconsistency
>> is about.
> 
> Wozniak is lying again and studiously ignoring the peanut
> butter barf all over himself.
> 
> He is assuming that Newtonian physics with its universal
> time is true,

I'm not assuming anything right now, I apply
the inconsistent assumptions of the physics
of your idiot guru and derive 2 denying
themself predictions. I can do it, because
the mumble of your idiot guru was not even
consistent.