Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 23:08:43 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17ee4111f31b308b$545571$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com> <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com> <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <vag5lm$22tfc$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vag5lm$22tfc$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 22
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 21:08:43 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2068
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ef14dd74c304ba$550814$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2490

W dniu 25.08.2024 o 22:54, Python pisze:
> Le 25/08/2024 à 17:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> ...
>> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>> an absurd lie, trash?
> 
> Some part of physics may need a definition of second,
> some other parts don't. Relativity (or Newtonian physics)
> doesn't.

If you're  asserting, it must be true...
But how did they make  measurements
"confirming" your beloved relativity
without units?

Oh, I know. They didn't measure anything.
Instead they read a lot of tales about
some twins doing it... Right?