Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 06:45:24 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <98212c666b602cbacf2476fc4341c29a@www.novabbs.com> <17ee5fade60d851b$504666$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com> <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 38 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 04:45:24 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2586 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2993 W dniu 26.08.2024 o 04:56, gharnagel pisze: > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 25.08.2024 o 17:21, gharnagel pisze: >> > > >> Not quite. The older ones are also mentioned >> there. > > But not asked about. Irrelevant, anyway. > >> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition >> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such >> an absurd lie, trash? > > Theoretical physicists don't define seconds. So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition of second? Will you be impudent enough for such an absurd lie, trash? Just stop dodging and changing the subject. >> I apply the inconsistent assumptions of the physics >> of your idiot guru and derive 2 denying >> themself predictions. I can do it, because >> the mumble of your idiot guru was not even >> consistent. > > Wozniak is daydreaming. He has assumed his conclusion > based on Newtonian time assumption Harmagel is lying, as expected from a relativistic piece of shit. I apply the definition of second valid in his moronic physics (the whole of it, including The Shit of his idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.