Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:19:02 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <b50bb10aa2dd5727a1bf8ff9bf88a049@www.novabbs.com> <17ee716d7c7bfd12$441950$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 51
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:01 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2946
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ef49d04f9ca728$637458$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3353

W dniu 26.08.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 4:45:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 26.08.2024 o 04:56, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 15:38:53 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>> > > of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>> > > an absurd lie, trash?
>> >
>> > Theoretical physicists don't define seconds.
>>
>> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>> an absurd lie, trash?
>> Just stop dodging and changing  the subject.
> 
> Repeating falsehoods don't make them true.

So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?



>> Harmagel is lying, as expected from a
>> relativistic piece of shit.
> 
> Wozniak is projecting his own dishonesty, and insulting
> and slandering, which he also projects.
> 
>> I apply the definition of second valid in his moronic
>> physics (the whole of it, including The Shit of his
>> idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
> 
> Wozniak is in denial of reality.  

The one Harmagel has deleted GPS clocks
from?


His assertion is
> misguided, dead wrong because he is basing it on
> Newtonian (universal) time

A lie, as expected from a piece of relativistic
shit. I'm only applying the definition of second,
valid in the whole physics (including The
Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.