Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:00:01 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <5ac85e6c9332ca0bece0023f17f2f442@www.novabbs.com> <17ee8ec58ffd13c8$485658$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef49d04f9ca728$637458$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <99644ad5bf4316e8ad0c33c2c88186c8@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <99644ad5bf4316e8ad0c33c2c88186c8@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 74
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:00:02 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3691
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ef4f5375487563$506650$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4117

W dniu 26.08.2024 o 16:35, gharnagel pisze:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 26.08.2024 o 13:24, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 4:45:24 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>> > >of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>> > > an absurd lie, trash?
>> > > Just stop dodging and changing  the subject.
>> >
>> > Repeating falsehoods don't make them true.
>>
>> So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>> of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>> an absurd lie, trash?
> 
> Copying and pasting falsehoods seems to be Wozniak's
> stock in trade.  

Desperate avoiding of answerring simple questions
seems to be Harmagel's stock in trade. Do you
think that the answer will change just because
of your refusing to spell it?


>> > > I apply the definition of second valid in his moronic
>> > > physics (the whole of it, including The Shit of his
>> > > idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
>> >
>> > Wozniak is in denial of reality.
>>
>> The one Harmagel has deleted GPS clocks
>> from?
> 
> Wozniak is being deceitful since the problem he posed

Oh, it's just a reminding that you're
a reality denying idiot, just like all
Einstein's worshippers.

>> > His assertion is misguided, dead wrong because he
>> > is basing it on Newtonian (universal) time
>>
>> A lie,
> 
> Nope.   The only way Wozniak can argue that 86400
> seconds per day is valid for the moving observer is
> by asserting Newtonian (universal) time.  


A lie, as expected from a piece of
relativistic shit. It's a direct
consequence of a definition, valid
in your moronic physics up to 1960-ies,
and making the insane mumble of your
idiot guru not even a consistent one.


>> I'm only applying the definition of second,
>> valid in the whole physics (including The
>> Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
> 
> Wozniak is lying since he was informed that a day
> on earth isn't a day on other planets, so 86400
> seconds only refers to earth. 

Harmagel is lying since he knows very well
that my example is about measuring Earth's
day.
Nothing unexpected from a fanatic of The
Shit, of course.