Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 07:16:34 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <c519bd5f0f4086da711ede104860ed8e@www.novabbs.com> <17eeb977c7724ff7$459327$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <694f454547a8e56961b6896086a119f8@www.novabbs.com> <17eede9524f9dfa3$533525$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <916be12c0817f8d3d361d8265d8c57d5@www.novabbs.com> <17eefed3289d061e$484574$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9da205dae3661a1709fed8ec149b04d3@www.novabbs.com> <17ef02dd9f274dac$613242$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6924ff328199394116710ac198f103e2@www.novabbs.com> <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef49d04f9ca728$637458$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <99644ad5bf4316e8ad0c33c2c88186c8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef4f5375487563$506650$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6f245833fb3cc5f325c276e2d0ead734@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <6f245833fb3cc5f325c276e2d0ead734@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 124
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 05:16:34 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 5145
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ef7e11220c8a88$512687$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5489

W dniu 27.08.2024 o 06:23, gharnagel pisze:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:00:01 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 26.08.2024 o 16:35, gharnagel pisze:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:19:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
>> > > of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
>> > > an absurd lie, trash?
>> >
>> > Copying and pasting falsehoods seems to be Wozniak's
>> > stock in trade.
>>
>> Desperate avoiding of answerring simple questions
>> seems to be Harmagel's stock in trade. Do you
>> think that the answer will change just because
>> of your refusing to spell it?
> 
> The only "questions" Wozniak asks are dishonest ones,

All questions Harmagel doesn't like are
dishonest - typical for a brainwashed
religious maniac.



>> > Wozniak is being deceitful since the problem he posed
>> > [added back in because Wozniak deleted it because he
>> > found ti to be devastating to his false narrative]
>> > had to do with an observer moving at c/s, which has
>> > nothing to do with the GPS.  Dishonest people try to
>> > change the narrative when they realize their vacuous
>> > assertions are refuted.
>>
>> Oh, it's just a reminding that you're
>> a reality denying idiot, just like all
>> Einstein's worshippers.
> 
> "When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of
> the losers. -- Socrates


And that's why you and your fellow idiots,
apart of denying the reality, slander so
much.




> 
>> > > I'm only applying the definition of second,
>> > > valid in the whole physics (including The
>> > > Shit of your idiot guru) up to 1960-ies.
>> >
>> > Wozniak is lying since he was informed that a day
>> > on earth isn't a day on other planets, so 86400
>> > seconds only refers to earth.
>>
>> Harmagel is lying since he knows very well
>> that my example is about measuring Earth's
>> day.
> 
> Wozniak is lying again because he claimed earlier
> no measurements were made. 

Harmagel is lying again because i said directly
that a measurement is in process, and
the whole thread is about predicting
its result by the inconsistent physics
of his idiot guru.



  It was a definition and
> a prediction.  Wozniak is definitely a turtle now
> because I predicted it then.  Does he now remember
> now? :-))
> 
>> Nothing unexpected from a fanatic of The
>> Shit, of course.
> 
> Nothing unexpected from a fanatical congenital
> liar and slanderer who cowardly runs away from
> facing the proof that his assertions are vacuous
> nonsense:
> 
> And he continues to lie by omission because he
> can't defend his flimsy assertions by the clod,
> hard facts which refute them:
> 
> https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
> 
> https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
> 
> https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.15970
> 
> "Experiments at a particle accelerator in Germany confirm
> that time moves slower for a moving clock than for a
> stationary one."


A very impudent lie, believable only by
idiots like you; no moving clocks were
involved - relativistic idiots have only
fabricated them.
On the other hand, we have GPS, anyone
can check, moving clocks are keeping
synchronization.


> 
> And THAT's why the moving observer would observe a day on

No, if we put an observer on a GPS satellite,
he would obviously observe the same thing
we do: the clocks are keeping sync.
But that's irrelevant for the thread which is
about inconsistency of The Shit of your idiot
guru, not about any observation.