Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17efa2425b0b8dc4$541189$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 18:19:49 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17ef2dc9521ac81e$518524$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <cf4da5f0623e38e6ea143cc17baa3df8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef49d04f9ca728$637458$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <99644ad5bf4316e8ad0c33c2c88186c8@www.novabbs.com> <17ef4f5375487563$506650$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6f245833fb3cc5f325c276e2d0ead734@www.novabbs.com> <17ef7e11220c8a88$512687$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <23cf024421e08236d5d9a53fe6ff1051@www.novabbs.com> <17ef9d6e3e1ef923$670188$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <Ibjh1AmAa9PjZiQF-UQX-2NHlQ0@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <Ibjh1AmAa9PjZiQF-UQX-2NHlQ0@jntp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 22 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 16:19:48 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1875 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17efa2425b0b8dc4$541189$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2282 W dniu 27.08.2024 o 17:15, Richard Hachel pisze: > Le 27/08/2024 à 16:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> >> No clocks were ever accelerated in any accelerator. >> It's an impudent lie believable only by fanatic idiots. >> >> Anyway, your pathetic lies of zillions of >> experiments allegedly confirming the pathetic >> mumble of your idiot guru are completely irrelevant >> for this thread. >> >> The thread is about the inconsistent assumptions >> of his physics and inconsistent conclusions >> derivable from it. You're too dumb to understand >> even that, but still it is. > > That's right, you're absolutely right, and no clock has ever been placed > in accelerators. > Which presents a huge experimental problem. That's your problem.