Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 19:51:18 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of [SR]
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <45fd375adfc18f18878cefa21e4f4b95@www.novabbs.com> <17f03370b4565f4b$579417$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <d9c926a6c9fcb082495c9bd118e9bf08@www.novabbs.com> <17f038d71e55acff$584760$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <ad841da0a6ecd1268af33e012b996cd3@www.novabbs.com> <17f0447be1dca708$639122$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <ac8e79f3bfccf996ed94acec6c9d056d@www.novabbs.com> <17f04b720f77a302$639131$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <e4c869edcf7644d2982936e78ff344ac@www.novabbs.com> <17f04f0aa442b204$602281$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <fefc23dfe9b6c853e4f260e6f9acc2f1@www.novabbs.com> <17f0660d33597e0a$609532$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <ecc1cbf0f484e237b82d312335a771c3@www.novabbs.com> <17f0863c3f05fd66$618168$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <vasjam$e2la$16@dont-email.me> <17f087f24fe0f957$618169$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <vaslcv$e2la$20@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <vaslcv$e2la$20@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 44
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:51:18 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3114
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17f092fe6db35995$760519$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3536

W dniu 30.08.2024 o 16:36, Python pisze:
> Le 30/08/2024 à 16:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> W dniu 30.08.2024 o 16:00, Python pisze:
>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 15:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>> [boring nonsense]
>>>
>>> Maciej, did it come to your mind that your "argument" for the
>>> inconsistency of SR is soooo damned simple that if it were
>>> sound it would have been pointed out for ages by other people
>>> than you? If not by scientists (i.e. for you "member of the
>>> cult"), by other relativity deniers.
>>
>> Well, it is  so damned simple and it wasn't pointed
>> out, [...] - so your "logic is as worthless
>> as always.
>>
>> Of course, it's a bit amazing that all physicists
>> (and wannabe physicists as well) are so lost in
>> their pathetic "Laws of Nature!!!!!" delusions
>> that they're unable to make such a simple conclusion
>> from a basic  definition they have.
> 
> So all of human beings (at least the part that had thoughts
> about Relativity) for more than a century is stupid and lost BUT a

It's a much longer time.

See, poor stinker - I've talked to many of you, and
the result of asking any of you about the old
definition of second is always the same: the
asked idiot is "not understanding" the question.

If the definitition means no harm to your
moronic religion - why do you (and that means
all of you) keep desperately pretending it
never existed?
No answer? Of course.

Pumped with crap of Nature Herself speaking
to your idiot gurus - not for a century,
but since the beginning - you simply can't
treat the role of definitions seriously.
Too bad for you.